Real Estate India Property Forum –Gurgaon, Delhi, Noida, Mumbai –No Buy, Sell or Rent Properties here!

JOIN IREF

Go Back   Indian Real Estate Forum - www.indianrealestateforum.com > Real Estate in Indian Cities > Hot Cities > Chennai

Search Before Posting - Use 'Google Custom Search' - Keep forum free from Duplicate Threads - Use Descriptive Thread Titles

Reply Closed Thread

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15-05-09   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Maximum height permitted

Hi:
My brother is planning to construct a house on a 40x60 plot. He wants to go for the maximum permissible height. It's a corner plot and the width of the abutting roads are 30 feet each. What is the maximum permissible height? Pl tell me if you need any additional infor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-09   #2
abk is offline abk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raghavan.aiyangar View Post
Hi:
My brother is planning to construct a house on a 40x60 plot. He wants to go for the maximum permissible height. It's a corner plot and the width of the abutting roads are 30 feet each. What is the maximum permissible height? Pl tell me if you need any additional infor.
g+2 or stilt + 3
  Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-09   #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks abk. But isn't there a regulation that says the height can't be more than the width of the road it's facing? In that case it can't be more than stilt+2?
And if there's a 20 ft frontal set back, can there be a compromise on the other set backs? (Rear and side) from the regular 5ft?

Last edited by Raghavan.aiyangar; 15-05-09 at 05:38 PM. Reason: additions
  Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-09   #4
abk is offline abk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raghavan.aiyangar View Post
Thanks abk. But isn't there a regulation that says the height can't be more than the width of the road it's facing? In that case it can't be more than stilt+2?
And if there's a 20 ft frontal set back, can there be a compromise on the other set backs? (Rear and side) from the regular 5ft?
no such regulation in cmda front setback and back setback cannot be adjusted.side setbacks can be adjusted on either side but minimum setback has to be maintained in the sides.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-09   #5
Natarajg007
Unregistered User
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raghavan.aiyangar View Post
Thanks abk. But isn't there a regulation that says the height can't be more than the width of the road it's facing? In that case it can't be more than stilt+2?
And if there's a 20 ft frontal set back, can there be a compromise on the other set backs? (Rear and side) from the regular 5ft?
Hmm, the man who calls be as HATED! And he knows nothing about RE. And questions ABK due to ignorance. Go and see the CMDA rules. It talks about max height as also max number of floors. So with 2 floors if Max height restricts height per floor to 15 then with 3 floors it will restrict it to 10.
BTW, why dont you Iyengar go and ask your Wisey friend about it. Why come here are cry?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-09   #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
And he knows nothing about RE. And questions ABK due to ignorance. Go and see the CMDA rules
.

Nats, thanks for the response. You said the correct thing! Yes, I'm fully aware that I'm ignorant. To be honest with you, I don't even know some fundamental things in RE. In fact, that's one of the reasons, why I'm interested in seeing healthy discussions that can enrich me.

I did see the CMDA site, but got confused by the enormity of info. That's why thought of consulting doctors rather than taking a calpol on my own!
Nats, can you pl post here where you found this info?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-09   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tamilnadu
Posts: 855
My Mood: Relaxed
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abk View Post
no such regulation in cmda front setback and back setback cannot be adjusted.side setbacks can be adjusted on either side but minimum setback has to be maintained in the sides.
Dear friend,

Is this the reason that many builders, have set back on the sides of about 4 ft. or so only against 5 ft. required and leave good space for the coverd car sheds in the front in G+1 constructions, in the case of building approval by the Town Panchayat like Chitlapakkam etc.

ks2071746
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-09   #8
abk is offline abk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 615
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ks2071746 View Post
Dear friend,

Is this the reason that many builders, have set back on the sides of about 4 ft. or so only against 5 ft. required and leave good space for the coverd car sheds in the front in G+1 constructions, in the case of building approval by the Town Panchayat like Chitlapakkam etc.

ks2071746
no ks this is applicabale only for special bldngs g + 3 where the side setback has to be 2/3rd the height of the building(in I master plan) and the minimum set back was less so you can leave the minimum on one side and the balance of the 2/3 rd can be left on the other side for better utility and functionality.
the 5' for g + 1 is minimum setback and mandatory.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-09   #9
Natarajg007
Unregistered User
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Innar saitharai uruthal, avar nana nannayum saithu vidal.
!!!
Well CMDA site is not perfect nowadays and the older site seems not accessible now to me. Given my limited time and the fact that I am searching for a person who feels I am fit to be hated, I suspect you Raghavan can use this link if you choose to. As for CMDA it is better YOU SPEND UR TIME AND SEARCH than asking others to do it.
]http://www.hindu.com/pp/2007/09/08/stories/2007090850130600.htm[/URL]
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-09   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 336
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abk View Post
no ks this is applicabale only for special bldngs g + 3 where the side setback has to be 2/3rd the height of the building(in I master plan) and the minimum set back was less so you can leave the minimum on one side and the balance of the 2/3 rd can be left on the other side for better utility and functionality.
the 5' for g + 1 is minimum setback and mandatory.
abk,

a quick question, has second master plan come into effect?are approval being sanctioned based on the new guidelines?

considering a building plan was approved as per first master plan, and construction has started and nearing completion.can a new building plan including additional space/floor be submitted for approval based on new FSI rules in second master plan?

Please assume UDS was not registered for the buyers.

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by nabishek; 18-05-09 at 03:59 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
height, maximum, permitted

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
After Delhi, Bangalore to be the Next Maximum City Rex Bangalore 0 23-03-07 04:48 PM

ADVERTISE ON THIS WEBSITE - CONTACT US NOW
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 01:25 AM.



Home | About IREF | Terms and Conditions | Copyright Infringement Policy
Copyright © 2006-2012, www.indianrealestateforum.com, All Rights Reserved.
Bookmark and Share