meconsult

A cheating case was filed against Merlin Projects Ltd & Union Bank of India for offences committed u/s 420/427/120B of the Indian Penal Code and the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore Court, Kolkata, giving due cognizance to our complaint, directed the Police to investigate the case.
Case Ref No.is 1326/08 and Process No. is 775/08.

To know more about how you can be cheated by Builders and Bankers acting in collusion with each other, please visit consultcal.googlepages.com/merlinprojectsltd,cheatingcase

merlingroup

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear All,

We have learnt that one Mr. Partha Roy has been sending letters and e-mails to you with certain allegations.

The matter is subjudice and Mr. Partha Roy is sending distorted information suppressing a number of facts and his defaults.

We would like to emphatically state and place on record, that the said allegations are ill motivated, ill conceived, fabricated and totally unwarranted with motive of illegal gains.

We would like to inform the readers some past records about Mr. Partha Roy & his son Pandav Roy.

A. Mr. partha roy is Defaulter in 12 cases involving different banks/financial institutes.
B. his son, Pandav Roy (joint agreement holder) is defaulter in 5 cases involving different banks/financial institutes.
C. The defaults by both father and son are against home loan, credit card bills, car loans, education loan and personal loans as per reports by Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd. (CIBIL), a company promoted by and serving to banks and financial institutes, such as icici, hdfc, sbi and other banks etc.
Report from Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd. in the name of Mr. Partha Roy and Pandav Roy showing their defaukt is attached herewith.

D. mr. partha roy was also accused in Cheating case being no. 82/2004 at Kalighat Police Station, kolkata.


To briefly sum up, Mr. Partha Roy & his son Pandav Roy paid us a token amount against their commitment, towards the initial payment and arranged with Union Bank of India, to finance the balance payment, of the purchase consideration.

As per records, Merlin Group never had any transaction with Union Bank of India, Sarat Bose Road branch, apart from the home loan matter of Mr. Partha Roy and Pandav Roy.

Further, it was Mr. Partha Roy / Mr. Pandav Roy who wanted the home loan from Union Bank of India because his wife had an account in the same branch.

Mr. Partha Roy / Mr. Pandav Roy thereafter gave another cheque of Rs. 1,93,750/- favouring Merlin Projects Ltd. towards approximately 15% of the total consideration. This cheque of Rs. 1,93,750/- was dishonoured twice upon presentation (copy attached).

One Tripartite Agreement was entered into between the accused, Merlin Projects Ltd and Union Bank of India, Rash Behari Branch for the purpose of availing of home loan by accused from Union Bank of India.

However inadvertently, the fact of dishonour of the cheque for the sum of Rs. 1,93,750/- escaped the notice of us and so the provisions of the Tripartite Agreement was laid down without mentioning the fact of dishonour of the cheque of Rs. 1,93,750/- .
Mr. Partha Roy was required to repay Union Bank of India, Rash Behari Branch, a sum of Rs. 13,020/- w.e.f April 2004 by way of several equal monthly installments (EMI’s). After repayment of the first 5 or 6 EMI’s, i.e. from October 2004 (Intimation letter dated 2nd March 2005 from Bank attached), Mr. Partha Roy & his son Pandav Roy started defaulting in making repayment of the EMIs to Union Bank of India. The Union Bank of India after waiting for nearly two years, during which they repeatedly requested, reminded and insisted upon the Mr. Partha Roy & his son Pandav Roy to repay their dues to the Bank through EMIs, got the Row House sold to M/s. Murarka Advisory & Holdings Pvt. Ltd by invoking the provisions of the SARFAESI Act.
Mr. Partha Roy has alleged that we have not registered the Sale deed in favour of his son / himself. But the registration of the Row House No- B-15 at Merlin Greens Complex could not be executed in favour of Mr. Partha Roy for the following reasons:

a. The sum of Rs. 1,93,750/- which was due from Mr. Partha Roy remained and still remains unpaid.

b. Mr. Partha Roy and his son never came up with the stamp papers or the amount required to be paid towards stamp duty or any pay order favouring the Registrar of Assurances for the purpose of registration of the Deed of Conveyance.

c. Several letters from time to time were addressed by the Bank to Mr. Partha Roy and Mr. Pandav Roy, with a copy being marked to Merlin Projects Ltd. reminding that they were turning out to be a progressive defaulter. Upon coming to know that Mr. Partha Roy is not making the repayment to the Bank, Merlin Projects Ltd. grew apprehensive, because in the event of Mr. Partha Roy’s failure to repay the Bank, Merlin Projects Ltd being the guarantor, was required to replenish the Bank. While harbouring such a sense of fear, it was not possible for Merlin projects Ltd to transfer the property to Mr. Partha Roy, notwithstanding the sum of Rs. 1,93,750/- which was already due. A number of letters were also sent by Merlin Projects Ltd to Mr. Partha Roy in this regard.

The bank vide their notice ref. NRO:KOL:CRLD:940A:07 dated 24.04.07 (copy attached) addressed to Mr. Partha Roy, with a copy to us, informed him, of their decision for enforcement of Security Interest Action Notice, in respect of the said premises and demanded that all outstanding, inclusive of interest, be paid by them failing which, the Bank would invoke Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Re-construction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002

As per information available to us, Mr. Partha Roy paid a very small amount only covering few EMIs towards repayment against a loan of approx Rs.14,00,000/-. Against this default, bank foreclosed his loan account under SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 (SARFAESI) in Mid 2007.

Mr. Partha Roy approached Kolkata High Court and requested for Stay in proceedings under SARFAESI Act initiated by the bank but the High Court ordered the Union Bank to take its own course (order of High Court enclosed) .

Union Bank of India, took possession of Row House No- B – 15 on 24.08.07 under SARRFAESI Act by the Authorised Officer of the Bank. The Minutes dated 24.08.07 (copy attached) of taking possession, of the Row House and secured assets of Mr. Partha Roy and Mr. Pandav Roy, would clearly go to show that the borrowers Mr. Partha Roy and Mr. Pandav Roy, had voluntarily delivered physical possession of the Row House and secured assets which were taken in possession in his presence by delivering a copy of the possession notice as per Rule 8(1). As per the Minutes, the house was found to be vacant and only some unused utensils and clothes were found lying inside the premises, inventory of the same was made as per Rule 4(2). The Minutes were drawn in presence of witnesses and was duly signed by Mr. Partha Roy.

The said Inventory was prepared on 24.08.07 at 3.30 P.M. in presence of Mr. U. K. Sinha & Mr. Srikant Das. The Inventory was also signed by Mr. Partha Roy. In the said Inventory it was clearly stated that only the following articles were found.
1) Aluminium Trolley
2) One plastic chair
3) 3 cartoons containing utensils etc.
4) One bag with old clothes
5) Kitchen utensils
6) Five ceiling fans
7) Light fittings

The estimated value stood at Rs. 5,000/-. It was further stated in the inventory that all the movable items were kept in the house which was taken possession in presence of Mr. Partha Roy. It was further laid down in the inventory that according to Mr. Roy, “the items are used and household one without any value”.
In the light of the Minutes and the Inventory that was prepared on 24.08.07, it is clear that the property was re-possessed by Bank and Merlin Projects Ltd was not involved in such recovery process by Bank, as such, all allegations and claims made by Mr. Partha Roy against Merlin Projects Ltd. are totally absurd and frivolous and without any legal force.
The Order passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in favour of Mr. Partha Roy and his son is stayed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on the grounds:

(1) Mr. Partha Roy has cunningly not made Union Bank of India a party in the aforesaid case

(2) Mr. Partha Roy has intentionally suppressed many facts of the case including his defaults of payment which was to be made to the bank as EMI and to us against the Earnest Money (Rs. 1,93,750/- and the most important fact that the Union Bank invoked SARFAESI Act due to default.

Mr. Partha Roy should update his website with the aforesaid facts and stop misleading people.


After the re-possession of the Row House by bank, Mr. Partha Roy started creating red herrings by way of raising baseless disputes, in the matter and thereafter, sending various letters, complaints and e-mails to different forums.

With regard to the complaint before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, this is nothing but an exercise to harass us. The Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has directed the Police Authority to investigate into the matter. There is no Order to proceed against us as claimed by Mr. Partha Roy. Truth will prevail.

As a matter of fact, the motive of Mr. Roy is to harass us and squeeze money from us as per subsequent letters sent to us (Copy attached).

The e-mails sent and website created by Mr. Partha Roy are full of wrong information created as per the convenience of Mr. Partha Roy. However, the attachments will throw light on the actual story.


For and on behalf of

Merlin Projects Ltd.

List of Attachments can be seen at link. http://sites.google.com/site/proysdocsandfacts/home/asd

1. CIBIL Report in the name of Partha Roy
2. CIBIL Report in the name of Pandav Roy
3. Information from bank about bouncing of cheque
4. Letter from the bank informing default by Mr. Roy.
5. Order of High Court
6. Order passed in proceedings of SARFESI Act
7. Minutes signed between the bank and Mr. Partha Roy recording the repossession by bank.
8. Letter sent to us by Mr. Partha Roy requesting us to give him another bungalow.

amit_2009

Good work merlingroup!

I am sure this is a sign of great company in the making.

most builders would have just ignored online opinions in their arrogance. But taking the time to present the facts and expose a fraudster is great work indeed!

Your approach to customer service and maintaining company reputation is much appreciated and should be an eye-opener in the construction industry. Best Wishes!

roycalcutta

BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER
ANSWER TO THE COMMENTS MADE BY 'AMIT'

To know the full truth please search Google using the tag "merlin projects ltd union bank cheating".
If the complaints made by Mr. Partha Roy did not have adequate merit then the Police would have not been directed by the Hon'ble CJM & the Hon'ble Addl. CJM to investigate two separate criminal cases U/S.156(3) against Merlin Projects Ltd for offences committed U/S: 420/406/427/380/120(B) IPC.
Moreover, an order has been passed U/S 144(2) prohibiting Merlin Projects Ltd and their purported buyer - one Murarka Advisory & Holdings Pvt. Ltd, to refrain from entering the premises because the said sale made in violation of High Court Orders is invalid.
The CIBIL issues brought up by Merlin Projects Ltd has no bearing on the case and another criminal complaint has been filed against Mr. Sushil Mohta for Breach of Privacy & Confidentiality as shown below:
From:
Mrs.Uma Roy
Apt. 3B/C, Siddharth Golf View, 27/4 PGM Shah Road, Golf Green, Kolkata 700095.
Tel: 033 24990504, Cell: 9002068624

To:
Mr. P.K Surekha
President
CREDAI Bengal

Dear Sir:

From your website I noted that the declared objective of CREDAI West Bengal is as under:

"To perpetuate an ethical code of conduct, which is self-imposed & mandatory for all the member developers/builder of CREDAI to maintain integrity & transparency in the profession of real estate development".

In this connection, I reproduce below e-mails exchanged by one of your Committee Members, Mr. Sushil Mohta, Managing Director of Merlin Projects Ltd with his relative, Mr. Navneet Baheti a property agent based in Hyderabad:




Navneet Baheti

to director, me, vikash


show details

Sep 22





CIBIL reports attached.

Rgds,
Navneet


director wrote:


Dear Navneet,

I would like to know the CIBIL Report of the followings:

1) Pandav Roy, son of Mr. Partha Roy, date of birth 22.11.1977 residing at

(a) 31/2A, Sadananda Road, Kolkata – 700 026.

(b) Apartment No. 3B & 3C, Siddharth Go, 27/4, Prince Gulam Mohammad Shah Road, Golf Green, Kolkata – 700 045.

2) Mrs. Uma Roy, wife of Mr. Partha Roy date of birth 02.09.1952 residing at

(a) 31/2A, Sadananda Road, Kolkata – 700 026.

(b) Apartment No. 3B & 3C, Siddharth Go, 27/4, Prince Gulam Mohammad Shah Road, Golf Green, Kolkata – 700 045.

For your information Mrs. Uma Roy had a credit card, the detail is as under :

SBI 4317575209025502

Mrs. Uma Roy also had some bank accounts in SBI & Union Banks. Her Passport No. A8153183.

Regards

Sushil Mohta


"Print this mail only if absolutely necessary. Save Paper. Save Trees."
"This e-mail message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient acknowledges that ICICI Bank or its subsidiaries and associated companies, (collectively "ICICI Group"), are unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of ICICI Group. Before opening any attachments please check them for viruses and defects."



2 attachments — Download all attachments


Pandav Roy.pdf
35K View Download





Uma Roy.pdf
22K View Download



It may be noted that the webmaster of ICICI Bank has confirmed that the above e-mail reply sent by Mr. Navneet Baheti was routed through the ICICI Bank server.

It may be further noted that the applicable rules for accessing a confidential Credit Information Report or "CIR" from CIBIL are as under (source: www.cibil.com)

Access to CIBIL Information (FAQ)



Q.15: Who can access CIRs?



Ans: “Reports can be accessed by Members on the principle of reciprocity ie only those Members who have provided all their data to CIBIL are permitted to access CIRs. Members can do so only to take valid credit decisions. Disclosure to any other person or entity is prohibited”.


In connection with the above, I seek your kind clarifications on the following points 'without any prejudice' and without relevance to any other dispute/s that my family members may have with Mr. Sushil Mohta:

1. As the President of CREDAI Bengal, after taking into consideration the above mentioned rules of CIBIL, do you feel that the action taken by Mr. Sushil Mohta in accessing confidential information pertaining to my son & myself from CIBIL in violation of CIBIL rules was ethically correct and in line with the declared objective of CREDAI?

2. If in your opinion the action taken by Mr. Sushil Mohta was unethical then to uphold its reputation and integrity will CREDAI Bengal take any steps against the said errant member Mr. Sushil Mohta?

With Seasons Greetings

Mrs. Uma Roy

merlingroup

Dear Readers,

Shri Partha Roy and his family members have from time to time launched frivolous civil and criminal prosecution against Merlin Projects Ltd. (MPL) , its Managing Director Shri Sushil Mohta, Project Manager, Sri Vikash Mimani and others with the sole objective of harassing and humiliating them and compelling them to bow down to the unfounded and illegal claims of Shri Partha Roy and his family members without appreciating that the said row-house was not re-possessed by MPL but was re-possessed by UBI for default in repayment of the EMI against his housing loan and acting in terms of the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, due to default in payment of EMIs against the home loan taken by the Roy family..

Further to our posting of actual facts in the matter of false and unsubstantiated allegations labeled by Partha Roy and his advocate Nilmani Dutta in different web and blog sites, few updates on the same is given below.....
In police case filed by Mr. Partho Roy, the police have found nothing wrongful done by Merlin Projects Ltd.(MPL) and its officials and the report states as follows:
“During investigation a huge number of documents were seized from different corners, many persons were examined and their statements were recorded. The accd no.4 Supriya Sengupta got anticipatory bail from the Ld. Sessions Court, Alipore and presently he is in C.B. till 12.2.2010. From the documents seized and persons examined no criminal conspiracy between Merlin Projects Ltd and the branch manager Supriya Sengupta could be established. From the investigation, it appears that this is nothing but a breach of agreement among the complainant, Merlin Projects Ltd and the Union Bank of India, which occurred due to some dispute regarding the payment/non-payment of the earnest money worth of Rs.1,93,750/- to Merlin Projects Ltd by the complainant and the non-payment of registration cost by the complainant to Merlin Projects Ltd. Also presently a case is sub-judice under the Learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Court in the same matter. Under such circumstances, this case may be disposed of as civil in nature……”

Pursuant to such notice, Shri Partha Roy appeared before the Learned Magistrate and filed a Narazi petition under section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, inter alia, praying for causing a further investigation in the said criminal case being Bhowanipore Police Station Case No. 90 of 2008 dated 5th April, 2008 and also prayed for rejecting the aforesaid final report. However, upon hearing the parties, the Learned Magistrate by order dated 19th June, 2010 rejected the Narazi petition filed by Shri Partha Roy and accepted the aforesaid final report submitted by the Investigating Agency and discharged the accused persons namely Shri Sushil Mohta and Shri Vikash Mimani of MPL and one Supriyo Sengupta, Manager of UBI.

In the order dated 19th June, 2010, the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Alipore, South 24 Parganas inter alia observed as follows:-
“I do not find anything to disagree with the view of the I.O. The property in question was sold under law following provisions of SARFAESI Act and there is absolutely no ground to presume that the accd. persons had committed offences under sections 420/427/120B of the Indian Penal Code.”
Such order dated 19th June, 2010 passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Alip--ore, South 24 Parganas was assailed by Shri Partha Roy before the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta in C.R.R. No.2929 of 2010. By a judgment and order dated 24.3.2011 His Lordship the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee dismissed the said revisional application filed by Shri Partha Roy and inter alia observed that the final report submitted by the Investigating Agency was very rightly accepted by the Learned Magistrate. A copy of the judgment and order dated 24.3.2011 passed by the Hon'ble High Court in C.R.R. No.2929 of 2010 is enclosed herewith.

Shri Partha Roy with the aid of others commenced a vilification campaign by circulating false, frivolous and defamatory imputations and emails against MPL, its employees and Shri Sushil Mohta and publishing blogs against them in the internet.

Being aggrieved by the incessant, repeated harassive and vexatious actions of Shri Partha Roy and their family members and being further aggrieved by the publication of various defamatory and scurrilous imputations against MPL and its highly placed officials including Shri Sushil Mohta, MPL filed a suit for defamation before the Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta and the same was numbered as C. S. No. 170 of 2010. The said suit for defamation was moved before His Lordship the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjib Banerjee and by order dated 29th June, 2010 His Lordship was pleased to observe that Shri Partha Roy and his family members have embarked on a scheme of publishing defamatory material concerning MPL without any just cause. Accordingly, His Lordship allowed the prayer of MPL in terms of prayer (a) of the interlocutory application filed in said suit which is set out as follows and the order dated 29th June, 2010 is enclosed herewith .
“Injunction restraining the respondents and each one of them, their servants, agents and/or assigns by whatever name be called from making, writing, publishing, printing or circulating any further or other insinuations or aspersions of similar or like nature as those contained in annexures “A” to “G” to the petition, in any manner whatsoever.”

Due to flagrant violation of the order dated 29th June, 2010 of the Hon'ble High Court, Contempt Rules were issued against Shri Partha Roy on 10.9.2010 in C.C. No.137 of 2010.

MPL and Shri Sushil Mohta were once again constrained to file a suit for defamation before the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta inter alia against Shri Nilmani Dutta the Learned lawyer, of the said Shri Partha Roy, and the same was numbered as T No.42 of 2010. By order dated 21.10.2010 an interim order was granted by the Hon'ble Court.

Another Contempt Rule dated 6.1.2011 was issued by the Hon'ble High Court against Shri Nilmani Dutta the Learned lawyer, of the said Shri Partha Roy, in C.C. No.163 of 2010.

In the said suit for defamation being C. S. No. 170 of 2010 initiated by MPL against the said Shri Partha Roy, by order dated 11.3.2011 the Hon'ble High Court observed that a case of defamation has been made out and granted an injunction restraining the said Shri Partha Roy and any of his servants/agents/ assigns from causing any further publication of the blogs complained or repeating the allegations in the blogs in any manner whatsoever and also directed the said Shri Partha Roy to immediately remove the blogs.


Being further aggrieved by the vilification campaign as aforesaid, Shri Sushil Mohta filed a petition of complaint before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas under sections 500/34 of the Indian Penal Code numbered as Complaint Case No.5552 of 2010 against Shri Partha Roy and others and process has been issued in the same upon the accused persons therein. Shri Partha Roy has been enlarged on bail upon appearance before the Learned Magistrate and the next date is fixed in August, 2011 for recording of plea.

Furthermore, Shri Sushil Mohta lodged a written complaint against Shri Partha Roy and others and pursuant thereto, a criminal case was registered for investigation at Jadavpur Police Station Case under sections 66A/77B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (as amended upto date) read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Another case of forgery and extortion was started against the said Shri Partha Roy at Bhowanipore Police Station at the behest of MPL. The prayer for bail of Shri Partha Roy was refused by the Learned Courts below and subsequently was granted by the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta. Upon conclusion of investigation, the Investigating Agency has submitted a Charge Sheet against the said Shri Partha Roy.
Notwithstanding such orders of injunction and the Contempt Rules passed / issued by the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta, the process of making false, frivolous and malicious publications all over the internet, blogs and S.M.S.s against MPL and Shri Sushil Mohta continues, and an absolutely irresponsible, false, malicious propaganda continues to trouble and malign MPL and its officials at the behest of the said Shri Partha Roy and their family members and others.
The blogs created by Partha Roy against Merlin Projects Ltd. and its officials is glaring example of false, frivolous and per se defamatory publications repeatedly being published and circulated in collusion and in conspiracy with others through the internet and the allegations made therein are bereft of a single grain of truth.
The brief background of facts and subject matter, along with documentary evidence can be viewed in following link Communications / Attachments - Merlin Group-facts related to Mr.P. Roy

for and on behalf of
Merlin Projects Ltd.

roycalcutta

WE SHALL OVERCOME CORRUPTION & INJUSTICE

Merlin Projects Ltd have misrepresented the correct facts in their above submission.
The Ld. Court has not absolved them of their guilt but have stated that the matter should be tried under civil laws.
The above opinion was based on the incorrect Investigation Report furnished by the Police.
Subsequently, a case was filed u/s.200 Cr.P.C for offenses like cheating, breach of contract, theft etc and upon examination of evidence, due process has been started against Sushil Kumar Mohta of Merlin Projects Ltd and he has been summoned to face trial.
Moreover, there are 3 other cases filed u/s.156(3) Cr.P.C which are pending for a long time thanks to the good friends of Sushil Mohta in the Police Department.
To know the correct facts duly substantiated with documentary evidence, please visit the website:
https://sites.google.com/site/merlin...tdsushilmohta/
Regards
Partha Roy

gharondabhai

As an independent third party, without any bias to either builder or buyer, I would be interested to know the authenticity of the following email (posted at Communications / Attachments - Merlin Group-facts related to Mr.P. Roy)


I just said authenticity ... no justification, context or explanation is required. The answer can be a simple "YES" or "NO"


**************************

From: P.ROY <roycalcuttagmail.com>
Date: Sep 6, 2009 11:26 PM
Subject: A personal letter
To: sushilmerlinprojects.com


Dear Mr. Sushil Mohta,

This is a personal letter which is being issued without prejudice to various ongoing litigations between us and is being written just as one human being to another.

I refer to the E-mail I had circulated to various concerned authorities and the media with the heading “Another Vedic Village” a copy of which was also marked to you.

Since sending off this mail, I am being pestered by investigative reporters and others seeking further information which is available with me but which I have so far declined to provide because I feel that by doing so I would be causing widespread repercussions that would adversely affect your personal reputation.

Moreover, I feel that it would be unfair of me to do so because I have nothing against you personally.

As a matter of fact, I now feel that I had possibly overreacted by circulating this E-mail which I did only because various matters adversely affecting my reputation which were not related in any manner with the criminal case filed by us, were mentioned by MPL to the Police .

Bringing up these issues did not serve any purpose other than painting an incorrect picture about us.

My wife & I had chosen Merlin Greens as the last resort of our twilight years and after being compelled to leave our house there due to lack of amenities, we have been suffering terribly.

Since then we are living in a rented flat where I am now paying Rs.15,000/- per month, an amount which I can ill afford.

Moreover, my son, a foreign qualified IT professional, contracted a neurological problem and had to return to India from UK where he was very well placed.

The combination of above circumstances possibly made me do many things which are generally against my nature.

In view of the situation, it is requested that you consider our position in the correct perspective and provide us with a house in Merlin Greens to which we can shift immediately.

Thereafter, I will withdraw all complaints against MPL and will make every effort to ensure that your reputation is not adversely affected; by taking any steps that you may consider appropriate.

Also, if we can comfortably & peacefully live in Merlin Greens, then I will ensure that many of my friends and relatives who are on the verge of retirement also buy properties in the same complex so that we can form a community of Senior Citizens which will further attract others.

There is a saying that “The wise does at once what the fool does at last!”

Let us both be wise and not delay this issue any further by arguing on matters concerning our individual profits or losses.

Regards

Partha Roy


Apt.3B/C, Siddharth Golf View Building
27/4, PGM Shah Road, Golf Green
Kolkata 700095, W.B, India
Tel: +91 33 24187415
Cell: +91 9830596146
Alt. E-mail: roycalcuttagmail.com

roycalcutta

Reply to question on 'authenticity'

Mr. Sushil Mohta, Managing Director of Merlin Projects Ltd has been found prima-facie guilty of committing offenses like cheating, criminal breach of trust, theft etc and has been summoned to face trial on 15/7/2011. Full details can be obtained at https://sites.google.com/site/merlin...tdsushilmohta/, a site created by Advocate Nilmani Dutta. The details published by Mr. Sushil Mohta at the Google Site mentioned by him has been found to be false and the Police have filed a FIR (Jadavpur PS case no.131/10) under Court Orders against him for forgery, criminal intimidation, violation of privacy of an innocent Bengali lady, receiving stolen property etc. Details can be seen at the site created by Advocate Nilmani Dutta. It is unlikely that all the money and contacts of Mr. Sushil Mohta will save him from going to prison.