Real Estate India Property Forum –Gurgaon, Delhi, Noida, Mumbai –No Buy, Sell or Rent Properties here!

JOIN IREF

Go Back   Indian Real Estate Forum - www.indianrealestateforum.com > Real Estate Developers > Real Estate Developers > Omaxe

Search Before Posting - Use 'Google Custom Search' - Keep forum free from Duplicate Threads - Use Descriptive Thread Titles

Reply Closed Thread

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28-01-11   #1
Moderator
 
MANOJa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shimla
Posts: 15,712
My Mood: Asleep
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,171 Times in 885 Posts
Default Omaxe - Complaints

Omaxe Palm Greens pain & bad experience


Complaint against Omaxe Palm Greens, Greater Noida - refund demanded
December 27, 2010
By rajinder.singh
I would like to bring to your kind notice harassment through which I am going through due to Omaxe Builder.
In 2006, I booked an apartment with M/s Omaxe Buildhome Pvt. Ltd., and till now have made payment of Rs. 29,84,828/- without any delay in installment.
In 2007, I was allotted Flat No. 202, in Tower Peach Palm A, 2nd floor in Palm Greens project in Sector MU, Greater Noida, vide Allotment Letter dated 21/09/2007, having reference no. OBPL/COMM/MU/GN/584
I have been paying Omaxe regularly, without delay even during recession and have paid approx 30 L till noe.
Even after 4 years, I am surprised to see that still not even structure of towers are ready. It has been 4 years since that flat was booked and till date, the company has not been able to erect even the structure of apartments.
At the time of booking of this project and in Builder Buyer Agreement, the project size mentioned is 50 Acre. But Omaxe reduced the size of plot drastically by more than 50% to only 23 Acres, without even informing their customers.
After reducing size of the project, Omaxe added future projection towers in between the under construction towers, making the overall project too cluttered with buildings. Omaxe also reduced Project features in the new layout thus reducing it from 16 features to only 8 features. What was supposed to be the USP of this project, is no where in the new layout.
The builder is also forcing me to sign the Builder Buyer Agreement of 50 Acre, which I believe , is drafted very heavily in Builder's favour. I have registered my protest against this with various officials but nothing has been done in this regards.
I have written several mails to them, visited their office many times and wasted complete day just to discuss my case with the concerned person. I gave them option to switch me to any other ready to move project and I will pay the differential amount right now. But non one listens to my request.
Omaxe has now come up with Orchid project in same area, where in cost of the project is further deuced and is all inclusive of parking, club facility etc, for which I am being charged in tune of 7 L approx. Since this project has kicked off, means Plam greens project wil be further delayed.
With support of your services and in the light of the aforementioned facts, and that the builder is not doing construction to complete this already delayed project, I request you to take appropriate actions against the builder and help me in complete refund along with interest.
Rajinder Singh
----, ........ Enclave, .....mpura, Delhi
Email: ......r.pmgmail.com
Contact No.: 9-------, 9----------
IP: ......15.159 / December 26, 2010 / 4:02 pm



Deepak Garg on December 31, 2010 at 4:32 pm
I have similar experience with this builder having invested in the same project. I never expected this from a reputed company whose chairman is the President of National Real Estate Development Council (Naredco.

I have paid Rs. 21,00,000 so far. It is a hard earned money and it pains to see this being in the grabs of an affluent builder.

This company has no customer ethics. They do not pick-up calls, would not keep promises to call back, will arise voice at their customers, will deny saying things they ahve said. I have all the details of email communications with them. Unfortunately, no details of tele communications due to obvious techinical reasons, which could exposed their appalling behaviour with customers.

I fully support Mr Singh's complaint and hopefullly it brings justice to us.




Yashwant K Singh on January 13, 2011 at 1:11 pm
I am having the same problem.

Had booked 4 bhk in Gold Palm -B. Paid booking amount 1.5 years ago.
Now The building is not going to be constructed. Instead ORCHID will come up there. This all being done without our notice.While on they are telling that they are starting construction in a few days!

Let us get together. Higher a known Lawyer who is really known or relative of some one known. I am ready to contribute money for the fees. Let us get our money back. This project is in mess. And perhaps
will take another 5 years to get delivered. They are just cheating us!

Yashwant Singh
......hsuper.....rs.com.au
(I am resident in Australia)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-11   #2
Moderator
 
MANOJa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shimla
Posts: 15,712
My Mood: Asleep
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,171 Times in 885 Posts
Default Development agreement between PUDA-Omaxe challenged in Court

A Public Interest Litigation petition has been filed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking revocation of land acquisition by the Punjab government in Patiala district to the tune of 336 acres. Stating that acquisition of the concerned land was made on the ground of ‘Public Purpose’ the petition claims that the state instrumentality as well as the private developer are utilising the acquired land for commercial purposes.

The petition has challenged a development agreement entered between Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) and Omaxe Ltd and sought revocation of the land acquisition. The Bench of Acting Chief Justice AK Goel and Justice AK Mittal today issued notices to state government, PUDA and Omaxe Ltd. in the matter.

The petition filed by one Harbhajan Singh from Patiala district seeks an investigation in the matter and claimed that land acquired under the guise of public purpose cannot be utilised for commercial purpose. Singh claims in his petition that a compensation of Rs. 28 crore was given to those whose land was acquired. The same land has fetched about Rs. 300 crore to private developer Omaxe Ltd., Singh alleged.

The Bench sought reply from the respondents by July 29.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-11   #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
My Mood: Aggressive
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You are right ManojA, Punjab and Haryana highcourt issued stay orders on this project till next orders. Now next hearing regarding the case is on 22nd Nov 2011.

But the rates are already slashed down in the project, at one stage it was around 21000 Per sq yd but not it is around 8000 sq yd.. but no buyer at this rate as well.. same in the case of commercial project...


Quote:
Originally Posted by MANOJa View Post
A Public Interest Litigation petition has been filed before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking revocation of land acquisition by the Punjab government in Patiala district to the tune of 336 acres. Stating that acquisition of the concerned land was made on the ground of ‘Public Purpose’ the petition claims that the state instrumentality as well as the private developer are utilising the acquired land for commercial purposes.

The petition has challenged a development agreement entered between Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) and Omaxe Ltd and sought revocation of the land acquisition. The Bench of Acting Chief Justice AK Goel and Justice AK Mittal today issued notices to state government, PUDA and Omaxe Ltd. in the matter.

The petition filed by one Harbhajan Singh from Patiala district seeks an investigation in the matter and claimed that land acquired under the guise of public purpose cannot be utilised for commercial purpose. Singh claims in his petition that a compensation of Rs. 28 crore was given to those whose land was acquired. The same land has fetched about Rs. 300 crore to private developer Omaxe Ltd., Singh alleged.

The Bench sought reply from the respondents by July 29.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
complaints, omaxe

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Delayed Possession & Fraud - Launch Complaints with CCI pcpune Pune 1 5 Days Ago 12:13 PM
Omaxe Grandwoods saurabh_real Noida 13 30-05-11 02:21 PM
Non refund of booking amount by M/s Omaxe for flat in project 'Omaxe City' at Jaipur jkgupta Omaxe 3 24-05-11 05:14 PM
Mapsko Builders - Complaints MANOJa Other Developers 8 11-03-11 10:44 PM
Gaursons - read consumer complaints dceite Noida 1 26-08-10 04:13 PM

ADVERTISE ON THIS WEBSITE - CONTACT US NOW
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 12:27 PM.



Home | About IREF | Terms and Conditions | Copyright Infringement Policy
Copyright © 2006-2012, www.indianrealestateforum.com, All Rights Reserved.
Bookmark and Share