142,392+ Members
   Get Started   Latest Posts Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
IREF® Real Estate in India - Property Discussion
IREF® - Indian Real Estate Forum > Real Estate in India > Real Estate Pune > Difference between society and apartment deed and which is better?
Like Tree6Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 9 2011, 12:51 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Likes Received: 0
Likes Given: 0
My Mood: Confused
Default Difference between society and apartment deed and which is better?

Hi,
Could someone please let me know the main differences between apartment deed and society? I am looking for a 2 BHK and have come across a small builder who is selling flats in a single building but due to less number of flats in building he is offering apartment deed instead of society. Will having an apartment deed may cause some issues in future? Please provide your valuable inputs.
Regards,
Benarasi

 
Old May 12 2011, 04:55 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 140
Likes Received: 23
Likes Given: 2
Default

Our builder is pushing for forming of Apartments rather than a Co-op Housing Society.

What are pros n cons of forming a Co-op Society v/s Apartments?
 
Old May 12 2011, 05:43 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 711
Likes Received: 122
Likes Given: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sno247 View Post
Our builder is pushing for forming of Apartments rather than a Co-op Housing Society.

What are pros n cons of forming a Co-op Society v/s Apartments?
Well , since lot of builders are pushing for apartment deeds , buyers should smell a rat...that rat is that after project completion and society formation builder needs to convey the land and funds to the society , he can't meddle and is not a stakeholder anymore .
Apartment deed comes with a sugar coating that buyer can sell the apartment without society/builder NOC , but the catch is builder may remain a stakeholder even after project completion . So why give him that right and repent later ?
omya123 likes this.
 
Old May 5 2012, 03:29 PM   #4
New Member
 
Sachin142's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 32
Likes Received: 0
Likes Given: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suryawork View Post
Well , since lot of builders are pushing for apartment deeds , buyers should smell a rat...that rat is that after project completion and society formation builder needs to convey the land and funds to the society , he can't meddle and is not a stakeholder anymore .
Apartment deed comes with a sugar coating that buyer can sell the apartment without society/builder NOC , but the catch is builder may remain a stakeholder even after project completion . So why give him that right and repent later ?
Is there any difference between the ownership of land if apartment deed is done rather than the Conveyance Deed ?

What kinds of Right the builder/ owner of land if he does the Apartment Deed ?

Is there any NOC required from builder/ Society( in case we can form the society ) Resale flat if Apartment Deed is done ?

Please let us know the pros and cons of Apartment/Conveyance Deed in case of Resale Flats..

Thanks Everyone.
 
Old January 15 2013, 11:43 PM   #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7
Likes Received: 4
Likes Given: 0
Default

Can somebody please clarify the legal/operational difference between an 'Apartment' and a 'Society'? I have seen builders always tend to go for 'Apartment' formation and always try to avoid 'Society'. I spoke to some agents and they said that builder has lot of vested interests in doing so. The reasons I came to know are as below. Please let me know if anybody has any details on it -

1) Using increased FSI in future - The builder is interested in using the increased FSI which will be awarded by the govt. for that area in the future. If the 'Society' is formed, then the increased FSI will be owned by the Society and the builder does not have any right on it. But if it is an Apartment, then the builder owns that increased FSI and can use it anywhere. Thus the builder will keep taking advantage of the FSI increase throughout in the future.

2) In an apartment, the builder retains the ownership of the open spaces which are not included in the saleable are. Example - Terrace, or any open parking/stairs space which is not included in the saleable area. But incase of Society, the builder cannot retain any right on any of these areas and has to hand over everything to the society.

3) Rules of 'Society' are binding on all the residents and nobody can follow his/her whims. So if the society decides to ban any objectionable commercial activities in the flats (such as noise-making music classes or using the flat for catering activities etc.) or not to rent out to bachelors etc., then all the residents have to abide by it. But if it is an Apartment, then owners can violate the apartment rules and the apartment body can just file a case in the civil court. And while the society disputes are resolved in a separate court (dedicated to cooperative society matters) and hence they are fast resolved, the Apartment matters have to be taken to the normal Civil Court and hence they typically take years and decades to resolve.

4) When the buildings go for redevelopment after 25-30 years, the 'Society' decision will be final and hence the society members will have negotiation power with the builder at that time. But if it is an apartment, the consent of every resident is required and hence it goes into an endless delay due to lack of a common decision acceptable to everybody. There are many instances in Mumbai wherein finally the buildings had to be forcefully vacated by court order due to this delay since they became unlivable. Thus while the decisions are taken on a 'majority' basis in society, the apartment goes with an 'acceptable by everybody' rule. So if the builder has retained even one flat in an apartment, he will play a veto card in his favour at the time of redevelopment.

Experts, please throw some lights on the above points.
immortal, TheTruth and Sat234 like this.
 
Old January 16 2013, 03:57 PM   #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7
Likes Received: 4
Likes Given: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shriram View Post
Can somebody please clarify the legal/operational difference between an 'Apartment' and a 'Society'? I have seen builders always tend to go for 'Apartment' formation and always try to avoid 'Society'. I spoke to some agents and they said that builder has lot of vested interests in doing so. The reasons I came to know are as below. Please let me know if anybody has any details on it -

1) Using increased FSI in future - The builder is interested in using the increased FSI which will be awarded by the govt. for that area in the future. If the 'Society' is formed, then the increased FSI will be owned by the Society and the builder does not have any right on it. But if it is an Apartment, then the builder owns that increased FSI and can use it anywhere. Thus the builder will keep taking advantage of the FSI increase throughout in the future.

2) In an apartment, the builder retains the ownership of the open spaces which are not included in the saleable are. Example - Terrace, or any open parking/stairs space which is not included in the saleable area. But incase of Society, the builder cannot retain any right on any of these areas and has to hand over everything to the society.

3) Rules of 'Society' are binding on all the residents and nobody can follow his/her whims. So if the society decides to ban any objectionable commercial activities in the flats (such as noise-making music classes or using the flat for catering activities etc.) or not to rent out to bachelors etc., then all the residents have to abide by it. But if it is an Apartment, then owners can violate the apartment rules and the apartment body can just file a case in the civil court. And while the society disputes are resolved in a separate court (dedicated to cooperative society matters) and hence they are fast resolved, the Apartment matters have to be taken to the normal Civil Court and hence they typically take years and decades to resolve.

4) When the buildings go for redevelopment after 25-30 years, the 'Society' decision will be final and hence the society members will have negotiation power with the builder at that time. But if it is an apartment, the consent of every resident is required and hence it goes into an endless delay due to lack of a common decision acceptable to everybody. There are many instances in Mumbai wherein finally the buildings had to be forcefully vacated by court order due to this delay since they became unlivable. Thus while the decisions are taken on a 'majority' basis in society, the apartment goes with an 'acceptable by everybody' rule. So if the builder has retained even one flat in an apartment, he will play a veto card in his favour at the time of redevelopment.

Experts, please throw some lights on the above points.
Guys, can somebody please give inputs on these points?
 
Old January 16 2013, 05:10 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: MUMBAI
Posts: 139
Likes Received: 52
Likes Given: 22
My Mood: Fine
Default Basic difference in ownership

Shriram- Yes your views are right

Please Note the differences in ownership

In society, Society is the owner of the property and all the flat holders are its members. All the flat holders have equal share in the property of the society. Nothing common is supposed o be reserved for anybody.

In Apartment, the share of the flat holder is different (proportionate) as per his/her area of Flat occupation. There can be reservations by the members such as parking, common terrace and easement rights. Also, if there is any excess FSI available, or would be available, builder can reserve it for himself and utilise it at any other place.

Thats why the complications could arise during redvelopemnt of Apartments scheme as mentioned by you.
 
Old January 16 2013, 05:44 PM   #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7
Likes Received: 4
Likes Given: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vjosh2 View Post
Shriram- Yes your views are right

Please Note the differences in ownership

In society, Society is the owner of the property and all the flat holders are its members. All the flat holders have equal share in the property of the society. Nothing common is supposed o be reserved for anybody.

In Apartment, the share of the flat holder is different (proportionate) as per his/her area of Flat occupation. There can be reservations by the members such as parking, common terrace and easement rights. Also, if there is any excess FSI available, or would be available, builder can reserve it for himself and utilise it at any other place.

Thats why the complications could arise during redvelopemnt of Apartments scheme as mentioned by you.
Thanks vjosh2.

Builders avoid to form 'society' for their vested interests and benefits which they want to reap forever in the future. Ideally all the buyers should insist the builder to form society and should get it clearly stated in the agreement. But due to lack of unity/awareness among buyers, the builders take advantage and mention 'apartment formation' in the agreement.
 
Old July 8 2013, 02:50 PM   #9
Member
 
LalaLala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: PUNE- PCMC
Posts: 81
Likes Received: 22
Likes Given: 14
My Mood: Cold
Default

How can we force builder to go for Society? Even in my case as well builder has mentioned to form Apartment (my agreement is due).

I have clearly told builder that I am in oppose of this clause. I would rather cancel my flat if he reject this.

There are 100+ flats in the scheme so in this case cant society be formed?
Or should I agree at this point and later can app member De-register Apartment and go for Society?

Plz reply.
 
Old July 8 2013, 04:31 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 846
Likes Received: 148
Likes Given: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LalaLala View Post
How can we force builder to go for Society? Even in my case as well builder has mentioned to form Apartment (my agreement is due).

I have clearly told builder that I am in oppose of this clause. I would rather cancel my flat if he reject this.

There are 100+ flats in the scheme so in this case cant society be formed?
Or should I agree at this point and later can app member De-register Apartment and go for Society?

Plz reply.
1. Dont sign any documents which take your consent to form apartment
2. Check the minimum number of registrations required in order to form a society (I think it is 60%). In that case if the builder does not agree to form society, people can get together and register the the society themselves.
3. If you want to defy the builder by step 2, better catch hold of a property lawyer and understand the details.
 
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Join IREF Now!    
Related Threads
What is the difference between an apartment deed/condominuim/co-operative society/federation?
Difference between Society Formation and Apartment Did
Difference between society and appartment
Difference in Rates for society and stand alone Building??
Difference between an Apartment and Society


Tags
apartment, deed, difference, society
".Pune.", ".Maharashtra."India