Originally posted by SRaj001
Common chennaivasi should not buy in a pre-construction project by making a booking amount and taking the building(castle) to the bank. If they do, it is lack of awareness and they need to be educated on risk/reward and explain that there is no free lunch anywhere. The thought of taking it to the bank should germinate after approvals are in place and *construction* commences. If the builder fails after this stage and give up throwing the towel, it reflects on the builder and brand/trust will take a hit.
If I buy from a builder based on PP presentation, I know what I am getting in to. I will assess how much money I can part with, in various stages commensurate with the risks involved. All the while being fully aware that there is no free lunch compared to buying a finished product and there is a non-zero risk lurking till it is handed over. I suggest/hope you refrain from making allegations without knowing what I buy and who I buy from. There is enough to focus on the merit/holes in what I am saying here and where I disagree with you.
Originally posted by SRaj001
Again laying off employees due to economic environment will be cheered by investors of the stock but the employee base's trust will be impacted, i worked and lived through the company that made the most popular programming language of our ages during the boom / doom. The companies that have large scale layoffs still being in admired list is an exception not the norm
I can show you the list year over year
Wegmans, Salesforce.com, SAS ( north carolina) , Netapp etc are there in this list for a good reason and layoffs is not one of them
I can show you the list year over year
Wegmans, Salesforce.com, SAS ( north carolina) , Netapp etc are there in this list for a good reason and layoffs is not one of them
Below is the list(Click) of companies considered attractive as an employer globally in 2013: In the last 3 years, I know for the fact the following names in the top-10 list had a layoff:
1. Google - laid off people in M*torola Mobility division in 2012 even before selling the business to Lenovo recently
2. GS
3. S*ony [For some reason, IREF filters the name with out the asterisk]
4. Siemens
5. Microsoft
6. JP Morgan
7 ......
............
My point is, one/few failures or a business decision to do the unthinkable do not affect the brand/trust and they continue to be attractive as employers. You know how it relates to HUS in the way I related in my earlier post.
Comment