Noida Extension Buyers Take on Builders

Home buyers who have invested in Noida Extension Real Estate projects are connecting online through discussion forums, facebook and other websites to vent out frustration against the builder lobby. Almost 100 people have signed up as members of a Facebook group that calls itself, 'Noida Extension Owners and Members Association'. The members include professionals from all walks of life.

NEOMA - Noida Extension Owners And Members Association is Noida extension owners and member association. The purpose and objective of NEOMA is to keep updated to all the Future residents of the Noida /Noida Ext. based on the users feedback. User can make their decision, owners can raise their voice in case of any issues.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supreme Court - Noida Extension News

Guyz look at Zee news. Noida extn ko rahat nahi....

नोएडा एक्सटेंशन को नंदीग्राम बनते नहीं देख सकते: SC

*नई दिल्ली। *सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने आज नोएडा एक्सटेंशन जमीन अधिग्रहण मामले में कहा
कि नोएडा एक्सटेंशन को दूसरा नंदीग्राम नहीं बनने दिया जाएगा। कोर्ट ने अपनी
टिप्पणी में कहा कि सरकार को जमीन अधिग्रहण को लेकर अपनी मानसिकता बदलनी होगी।

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार से पूछा कि खेती की जमीन अधिग्रहण करने से
पहले क्या इस बात की कोशिश की गई कि बंजर जमीन का अधिग्रहण पहले किया जाए। इस
दौरान कोर्ट में सरकार और किसानों के तरफ के पक्ष कोर्ट में मौजूद थे। सुप्रीम
कोर्ट ने इस मामले की जल्द सुनवाई करने से इंकार करते हुए कहा कि इसकी सुनवाई 5
जुलाई को होगी।Guyz look at Zee news. Noida extn ko rahat nahi....

नोएडा एक्सटेंशन को नंदीग्राम बनते नहीं देख सकते: SC

*नई दिल्ली। *सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने आज नोएडा एक्सटेंशन जमीन अधिग्रहण मामले में कहा
कि नोएडा एक्सटेंशन को दूसरा नंदीग्राम नहीं बनने दिया जाएगा। कोर्ट ने अपनी
टिप्पणी में कहा कि सरकार को जमीन अधिग्रहण को लेकर अपनी मानसिकता बदलनी होगी।

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार से पूछा कि खेती की जमीन अधिग्रहण करने से
पहले क्या इस बात की कोशिश की गई कि बंजर जमीन का अधिग्रहण पहले किया जाए। इस
दौरान कोर्ट में सरकार और किसानों के तरफ के पक्ष कोर्ट में मौजूद थे। सुप्रीम
कोर्ट ने इस मामले की जल्द सुनवाई करने से इंकार करते हुए कहा कि इसकी सुनवाई 5
जुलाई को होगी।Guyz look at Zee news. Noida extn ko rahat nahi....

नोएडा एक्सटेंशन को नंदीग्राम बनते नहीं देख सकते: SC

*नई दिल्ली। *सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने आज नोएडा एक्सटेंशन जमीन अधिग्रहण मामले में कहा
कि नोएडा एक्सटेंशन को दूसरा नंदीग्राम नहीं बनने दिया जाएगा। कोर्ट ने अपनी
टिप्पणी में कहा कि सरकार को जमीन अधिग्रहण को लेकर अपनी मानसिकता बदलनी होगी।

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार से पूछा कि खेती की जमीन अधिग्रहण करने से
पहले क्या इस बात की कोशिश की गई कि बंजर जमीन का अधिग्रहण पहले किया जाए। इस
दौरान कोर्ट में सरकार और किसानों के तरफ के पक्ष कोर्ट में मौजूद थे। सुप्रीम
कोर्ट ने इस मामले की जल्द सुनवाई करने से इंकार करते हुए कहा कि इसकी सुनवाई 5
जुलाई को होगी।
Read more
Reply
543 Replies
Sort by :Filter by :
  • zohaib(aam aadmi) ko bulao

    Originally Posted by Mogammo
    Several times you only ask for GENTRY , MNC CULTURE , UPPER MIDDLE CLASS ... .... .... of Greater Noida. After all of your above talks you have shown your GENTRY , your CULTURE , and which CLASS belongs to you. Nothing to prove now that you gives BIASED comments for any locations specially for GN. After all of your these cheap talks you have shown your CLASS and also prove that why GN region has highest CRIME RATE in whole NCR region after NOIDA, and why public do not want to live in GN. I think you are really very frustraed because you got only -ive returns from your Greater Noida property, and again TRUTH IS ALWAYS BITTER.

    GET WELL SOON..........


    ye lo zohaib ko phir ban kara diya ... ek wo hi aadmi aisa hai jise noida ki political, social aur economocal knowledge hai aur vo bhi unbiased tarike se ,
    ye saara kam broker group ka hoga....

    come back zohaib with new id, and give some good logic about the issues ....we will wait for u
    CommentQuote
  • Home dreams shattered as SC cancels Noida Extension land deals


    Home buyers and investors in Noida Extension were devastated after the Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the Allahabad High Court judgment quashing the acquisition of over 156 hectares of land in Greater Noida where a township is being developed.
    Investors, who are opting out of the various projects where they had booked homes - a process which began after the high court judgment - are likely to lose between Rs 1.2 lakh and Rs 4 lakh on the booking amount, sources said.


    Click here to Enlarge

    Wednesday's order by a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G. S. Singhvi and Justice A. K. Ganguly is a setback to the Mayawati government and builders. The latter had already sold a majority of flats which they proposed to build on plots allotted to them.

    Dismissing a batch of petitions by the state government and builders, the bench said there was no reason to interfere with the detailed reasons recorded by the high court for holding that the state government could not have invoked the urgency clause to deny hearing to farmers for acquiring land.


    At least four builders have been hit hard by the judgment.
    Click here to Enlarge


    The order pertains to land in Shahberi village and covers a part of the Noida Extension, the proposed township area in Greater Noida. It does not cover land in other villages in the area.

    About 6,000 buyers have been affected by the reverses to the projects but developers have taken steps to compensate buyers by shifting them to some other projects or refunding money, apex realtors' body CREDAI president (Western Uttar Pradesh chapter) Manoj Gaur told PTI.
    However, buyers were in a flap over the developments. Ravi Kant Pandey, who had booked a flat in Mahagun Mywoods in November 2010 said, "It's a state of complete panic for us. The developers are very sure about themselves. They are saying their project is safe. I just want my money back. But, they are saying that if I cancel my booking, 10 per cent of the booking amount will be deducted, which comes to Rs 2 lakh in my case." Other buyers also held similar views.



    At Shahberi the mood was euphoric, as villagers celebrated the court order. Sajid Hussain, chairman of the Dasna Nagar Panchayat and a farmers' representative accused the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) of forcibly taking away fertile agricultural land.

    "Industrial land was changed in its use to residential zone overnight without bringing to anybody's notice and secretly sold off to private builders. Besides, 20 farmers were sent to jail when they protested. It was only then that we approached the Allahabad high court which provided us relief," Hussain said.



    Sending a message across, the Supreme Court went on to impose a cost of Rs 10 lakh fine on GNIDA for allotting land to builders in violation of the purpose for which land was acquired, saying this was done before the state government approved the proposal for change in land use.

    The bench took strong exception to the fact that land was acquired for industrial purposes but was subsequently handed over to builders for housing projects by changing the land use.
    Justice Singhvi said during the hearing that the fraud was meticulously planned by officials who knew that land was to be handed over to builders after acquisition.
    On GNIDA's contention that it was a case of swapping - with a far off residential area being converted for industrial use - the court said, "You issued an advertisement inviting builders even before the change in land use was approved by the state government. Why did you not wait?" GNIDA said it had changed the land use to residential from industrial because there was a residential settlement in the neighbourhood located across a canal in the adjacent Ghaziabad district.
    Hence, an industrial area could not come up next to a residential zone. The land identified for industrial use in exchange was adjoining a railway line, and therefore appropriate. However, the court asked, "Was there no nala or the railway line when the areas were earmarked as industrial and residential respectively?"
    The petitioners (the land owners), who had challenged the land acquisition said while this could be done for public purposes but the time had come to define public purpose. "Public purpose should mean that the land will be used for the benefit of all and no section of the society should be deprived of the benefit."
    It was pointed out on behalf of the petitioners that poor people would not be able buy the flats that were coming up in Noida Extension or use their facilities.
    Their lawyer said that according to the collector's report, 185 farmers would have been rendered landless if the project had gone through.
    The bench said there was no excuse for the state to deny a hearing to farmers by invoking the urgency clause under the Land Acquisition Act. "About 60 per cent land acquired by the state for planned industrial development was lying unused and the state had evaded a reply when questioned," Justice Singhvi pointed out.
    The state government tried to salvage the situation by stressing that unauthorised colonies would have mushroomed in the area if it had not acquired the land. It showed aerial maps to show how the area was being divided into plots and even showed photographs of an unauthorised settlement in an adjoining area to prove its point. The court said the state government was bound to act in the public interest but had acted in the private interest.
    "We have given residential plots to farmers," the state government said.
    "You and me will not understand the psyche of a farmer losing land. They consider land as their mother," Justice Singhvi said.


    Home dreams shattered as SC cancels Noida Extension land deals : Uttar Pradesh: India Today
    CommentQuote
  • Stamp duty relief for UP farmers in offing

    The UP government has planned relief in stamp duty to the farmers whose land would be acquired for development.

    However, the farmers here have rejected the three options of land acquisition by private builders. They claim that under the policy, they are not given the option to sell land to other builders. Farmers would have a limited negotiation power under the present policy, they feel.

    As per the government plan, farmers will not have to pay the stamp duty on the 6 per cent developed land given to them. Further, if the farmer buys agricultural land from the compensation within one year, he will not have to pay the stamp duty on the purchased land.

    As per the policy, farmers were given three options to choose while selling land to private developers. They can negotiate the price with the developer. Further, they will have the option of getting land compensation or 16 per cent developed land where 50 per cent land could be utilized for commercial purposes.

    "Under the policy, farmer has to negotiate only with the developer selected by the state government. Here farmers will have a limited negotiation power. They should be allowed to sell land to other developers also," said Roopesh Verma, spokesperson, Kisan Sangarsh Samiti.

    The Tribune, Chandigarh, India - Delhi and neighbourhood
    CommentQuote
  • 400 acre land affected

    Boss, 400 acre land is not a small portion. It is very large.
    Just imagine Gaur city2 (GC2) is spanned in 112 acre. Land affected is almost 4 times to GC2.
    I also heard 5 acre of Gaur city1 affected.

    Hope, with end of this emergency clause vs non emergency clause fiasco, the financer will start financing afresh & work will start with super speed by builder on non disputed land.

    I also hope that builder, investor & end user will find all the land which is still disputed.
    In future, all the land which was acquired by emergency clause and farmers have not taken compensation will be declare illegal, by Allahabad high court. It is 200% sure. Beware.

    REST ALL PLOT ARE VERY MUCH SAFE & SECURE in noida extension.

    It is upto bank & others to find out which is safe project in above description.
    So visit Greater Noida Authority office to know it.
    CommentQuote
  • NEOMA is planing to visit Builders for clarification. NEOMA is requesting to all buyers to please be there in Noida extension Round About at 11 AM and then proceed to builder office to know what to do now?
    Media is approaching NEOMA to know the views of users which are affected. They want to talk to those buyers. NEOMA request affected buyers to share details and come in front and raise your concern.

    Please read the article in hindustan times which quotes NEOMA in his article.
    CommentQuote
  • As per todays Zee News (Business) the effected projects by SC ruling are supertech Ecovillage-II, amrapali-Smart city, mahagun-Myra, gaur city-2, Buland , Auracity, Patel Newton, Gulshan panchsheel, & earth Town
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by Kanikag
    I have invested in Gaur City Project in Noida extn..cld anybody pls tell if Gaur project falls under disputed land. Gaur Projects have a good name and I hope they would return the entire amount incase its over disputed area


    gaur city1 and Gaur city 2 is safe
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by gaur_uni
    gaur city1 and Gaur city 2 is safe


    yes surely... if loan is done.. that means all is safe for the project.. Bank wont finance without seeing all papers.. Banks have a army of lawyers to see all RE projects..
    CommentQuote
  • Again, just check with the bank again that they haven't stopped disbursing loan for these projects. If they are still doing it, then everything is fine.
    CommentQuote
  • "The bench took strong exception to the fact that land was acquired for industrial purposes but was subsequently handed over to builders for housing projects by changing the land use.

    Justice Singhvi said during the hearing that the fraud was meticulously planned by officials who knew that land was to be handed over to builders after acquisition."

    Will it not be applicable for whole of NE?
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by amarakbar
    "The bench took strong exception to the fact that land was acquired for industrial purposes but was subsequently handed over to builders for housing projects by changing the land use.

    Justice Singhvi said during the hearing that the fraud was meticulously planned by officials who knew that land was to be handed over to builders after acquisition."

    Will it not be applicable for whole of NE?


    Guys, correct me if I'm wrong but there are 2 basis for Supreme Court's decision:

    1. Use of urgency/emergency clause for land acquisition. Only a small part of land in NE is affected by this issue.

    2. Land was acquired for one purpose (industrial use) and used for another purpose (residential flats). Looks like it is being correctly pointed out by amarakbar that most or all of NE will be affected when this order of Supreme court is taken as a precedent by Allahabad High Court in deciding pending cases.

    So saying so and so project is safe in NE is wrong?
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by amarakbar
    "The bench took strong exception to the fact that land was acquired for industrial purposes but was subsequently handed over to builders for housing projects by changing the land use.

    Justice Singhvi said during the hearing that the fraud was meticulously planned by officials who knew that land was to be handed over to builders after acquisition."

    Will it not be applicable for whole of NE?


    In that case.. it will be good to know how land was acquired in GGN and FBD etc. also...
    CommentQuote
  • नोएडा एक्सटेंशन में छाई वीरानी!


    ग्रेटर नोएडा - सुप्रीम कोर्ट का फैसला आने के बाद पहले गुलजार रहने वाला नोएडा एक्सटेंशन बेजार हो गया है। दो दिन पहले तक जिन बुकिंग केंद्रों पर निवेशकों की भारी भीड़ रहती थी, बृहस्पतिवार को वो सूने रहे। यहां सिर्फ रीयल स्टेट के एजेंट ही नजर आ रहे थे। बृहस्पतिवार को कुछ बिल्डरों ने प्रभावित जमीन से अपना सामान समेटना शुरू कर दिया है और निर्माण कार्य भी बंद करा दिया है।

    सप्रीम कोर्ट ने बुधवार को साबेरी गांव में इलाहाबाद हाइकोर्ट द्वारा 156 हैक्टेयर भूमि अधिग्रहण को रद करने के फैसले को सही ठहराया था। कोर्ट ने ग्रेटर नोएडा प्राधिकरण को किसानों की जमीन वापस करने के निर्देश दिए हैं। इस निर्णय से भले ही किसानों में खुशी की लहर दौड़ गई है, लेकिन बिल्डर व निवेशकों में खलबली मची है। कोर्ट के फैसले से कई बिल्डरों की परियोजनाएं प्रभावित हुई है। एक्स बिल्डर ने पहले ही प्राधिकरण को जमीन वापस कर दी थी। चार बिल्डरों ने यहां निर्माण शुरू करवाया था, जिसे बृहस्पतिवार को बंद करवा दिया गया। वहीं तीन बिल्डरों ने प्रभावित जमीन पर अभी निर्माण कार्य शुरू नहीं किया था। इस समय जमीन पर पानी के स्तर की जांच चल रही थी, उसे भी बंद करा दिया गया है।

    इधर, आम्रपाली व पंचशील बिल्डर निवेशकों को दूसरी परियोजनाओं में फ्लैट स्थानांतरित करने का आश्वासन दे रहे हैं। जबकि सुपरटेक व महागुन बिल्डरों का कहना है कि उन्होंने प्रभावित जमीन पर अभी कोई योजना नहीं निकाली है। इसलिए उनका एक भी निवेशक प्रभावित नहीं हुआ। बिल्डर बेशक निवेशकों को दिलासा दे रहे हों, लेकिन निवेशकों की बेचैनी कम नहीं हुई है। निवेशक जेपी श्रीवास्तव, अंशु शर्मा व केपी सिंह ने बताया कि उनकी जीवन भर की जमापूंजी का सवाल है, इसलिए सोच समझकर निर्णय लेंगे। बृहस्पतिवार को नोएडा एक्सटेंशन वीरान दिखा। बुकिंग सेंटरों पर मौजूद कर्मचारियों ने बताया कि बुधवार से एक भी बुकिंग नहीं हुई है। बृहस्पतिवार को जितने भी निवेशक आए, उन सभी ने सिर्फ यही जानकारी ली कि कहीं उनका फ्लैट तो प्रभावित नहीं हुआ।



    -Dainik jagran
    CommentQuote
  • गांवों के किसानों की जमीन है साबेरी में

    सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा किसानों को जमीन वापस करने के फैसले से साबेरी गांव के साथ-साथ अन्य गांवों के किसान भी खुश हैं। कोर्ट के फैसले का उन्हें भी लाभ मिलेगा। साबेरी गांव में करीब 80 किसान परिवारों की जमीन अधिग्रहीत हुई थी। ग्रामीणों ने बताया कि गांव में चिपियाना के 15, रोजा याकूबपुर के 12 व रोजा जलालपुर के 5 किसानों की कृषि भूमि है। कोर्ट के फैसले का उन्हें भी फायदा पहुंचेगा। हालांकि कृषि भूमि के साथ गांव में 5 स्थानों पर अवैध कालोनी भी काटी जा रही है। इसमें गाजियाबाद, नोएडा, साहिबाबाद, हापुड़, डासना, पिलखवा व दिल्ली के कई लोगों ने 60, 100, 120 व 200 वर्ग मीटर के आवासीय भूखंड खरीद रखे हैं।
    CommentQuote
  • किसानों ने निकाला विजय जुलूस


    ग्रेटर नोएडा- सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा किसानों के पक्ष में निर्णय सुनाए जाने के बाद बृहस्पतिवार को नोएडा एक्सटेंशन के गांवों में किसानों ने विजयी जुलूस निकाला। किसानों ने कुछ जगह बिल्डरों का निर्माण कार्य भी बंद करा दिया। उनका कहना है कि न्यायालय के फैसले से किसानों में नई चेतना जागी है। जिन गांवों की जमीन पर कोर्ट से स्टे मिला हुआ है, उन पर निर्माण एवं विकास कार्य नहीं होने दिया जाएगा। जबरन कार्य किया तो किसान उसका विरोध करेंगे।

    बिसरख, पतवाड़ी, खैरपुर गुर्जर, तुस्याना, इटेड़ा, हैबतपुर, रोजा याकूबपुर, सैनी, ऐमनाबाद, खानपुर, खेड़ा चौगानपुर व जुनपत आदि गांव के किसान एकत्र होकर नोएडा एक्सटेंशन पहुंचे। खुशी जाहिर करने के साथ ही किसानों ने आरोप लगाया कि बिसरख समेत कई गांवों में किसानों को कोर्ट से स्टे मिला हुआ है। इसके बावजूद वहां निर्माण कार्य चल रहा है। शीघ्र ही कोर्ट में इसकी शिकायत की जाएगी। किसानों ने एकत्र होकर कई स्थानों पर निर्माण कार्य बंद करा दिया। किसानों ने कहा कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले से न्यायपालिका के प्रति लोगों का विश्वास बढ़ा है। प्राधिकरण भी अब किसानों का शोषण नहीं कर पाएगा। किसानों की आपत्तियों को सुने बिना अधिग्रहण की कार्रवाई हुई तो इसकी शिकायत कोर्ट से की जाएगी।

    -Dainik Jagran
    CommentQuote