पतवाड़ी के किसानों का लिखित समझौता
जागरण संवाददाता, ग्रेटर नोएडा किसानों के साथ समझौते की दिशा में ग्रेटर नोएडा प्राधिकरण को बृहस्पतिवार को बड़ी सफलता हासिल हुई। पतवाड़ी गांव के किसानों के साथ प्राधिकरण का समझौता हो गया। इससे बिल्डरों व निवेशकों को बहुत बड़ी राहत मिली है। समझौता भी किसानों के लिए फायदेमंद रहा। उन्हें अब 550 रुपये प्रति वर्गमीटर अतिरिक्त मुआवजा देने पर सहमति बन गई है। साथ ही आबादी व बैकलीज की शर्तो को हटा लिया गया है। हालांकि नोएडा के सेक्टर-62 में गुरुवार को देर रात तक अन्य मुद्दों पर प्राधिकरण व किसानों के बीच बातचीत जारी थी। इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने 19 जुलाई को पतवाड़ी गांव की 589 हेक्टयेर जमीन का अधिग्रहण रद कर दिया था। अधिग्रहण रद होने से सात बिल्डरों के प्रोजेक्ट प्रभावित हुई हुए थे। 26 हजार निवेशकों के फ्लैट का सपना भी टूट गया था। प्राधिकरण के ढाई हजार भूखंड़ों, चार सौ निर्मित मकानों व दो इंजीनियरिंग कॉलेज की योजना भी अधर में लटक गई थी। 26 जुलाई को हाईकोर्ट ने नोएडा एक्सटेंशन के अन्य गांवों की सुनवाई के दौरान प्राधिकरण, बिल्डर व किसानों को 12 अगस्त तक आपस में समझौते करने का सुझाव दिया था। हाईकोर्ट के सुझाव पर प्राधिकरण ने किसानों से समझौते के लिए वार्ता की पहल शुरू की। 27 जुलाई को प्राधिकरण के सीईओ रमा रमन ने सबसे पहले पतवाड़ी गांव के प्रधान को पत्र भेज कर वार्ता करने के लिए आमंत्रित किया। दूसरे दिन ग्राम प्रधान रेशपाल यादव ने प्राधिकरण कार्यालय पहुंच कर सीईओ से बातचीत कर उनका रुख जानने का प्रयास किया था। 30 जुलाई को सीईओ ने गांव पतवाड़ी जाकर किसानों से सामूहिक रूप में बात की। इस दौरान मुआवजा वृद्धि को छोड़कर किसानों के साथ अन्य मांगों पर प्राधिकरण ने सकारात्मक रुख दिखाया। मुआवजा बढ़ोतरी पर बातचीत करने के लिए किसानों को आपस में कमेटी गठित कर वार्ता का प्रस्ताव सीईओ दे आए थे। इसके बाद किसानों के साथ गुरुवार को नोएडा के सेक्टर-62 में बैठक बुलाई गई। इसमें प्राधिकरण के सीईओ रमा रमन, ग्रामीण अभियंत्रण मंत्री जयवीर ठाकुर, सांसद सुरेंद्र सिंह नागर व जिलाधिकारी के साथ किसानों की वार्ता शुरू हुई। आठ घंटे तक वार्ता चलने के बाद किसान समझौते के लिए तैयार हो गए। सूत्रों के अनुसार पतवाड़ी गांव के किसानों को मिले 850 रुपये प्रति वर्गमीटर के अलावा 550 रुपये प्रति वर्गमीटर और देने पर सहमति बन गई है। देर रात तक बैठक जारी थी। अभी इसकी अधिकारिक घोषणा नहीं की गई है। हालांकि गांव के कुछ किसानों ने वार्ता की पुष्टि की है। इससे पूर्व किसानों की आबादी को पूरी तरह से अधिग्रहण मुक्त रखा जाएगा। बैकलीज की शर्ते हटा ली जाएगी। पतवाड़ी गांव का समझौता होने पर प्राधिकरण को नोएडा एक्सटेंशन के अन्य गांवों में किसानों के साथ समझौता करने की राह आसान हो गई है। नोएडा एक्सटेंशन विवाद ने रोके खरीददार : नोएडा एक्सटेंशन विवाद ने समूचे ग्रेटर नोएडा एवं यमुना एक्सप्रेस वे प्राधिकरण क्षेत्र में संपत्तियों की खरीद-फरोख्त पर ब्रेक लगा दिया है। दोनों जगह ढूंढे से भी खरीददार नहीं मिल रहे हैं। कुछ समय पहले तक जो लोग शहर में अपना आशियाना बनाने के लिए आतुर थे, वे अब यहां संपत्ति खरीदने से हिचकिचा रहे हंै। पिछले बीस दिनों में भूखंड व मकानों की गिनी-चुनी रजिस्ट्री हुई हैं। सिर्फ गांवों में कृषि व आबादी भूमि की रजिस्ट्री हो रही है। इससे प्रदेश सरकार को राजस्व की भी हानि उठानी पड़ रही है
-Dainik Jagran.
Read more
Reply
16356 Replies
Sort by :Filter by :
  • Trial Bhai....... where r u?

    waiting for your weekly survey report...........
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by rohit_warren
    I am surprised once again. How a chartered accountant can miss this simple logical stuff.

    Land grabbed forcefully matter is under litigation, no resale allowed no exit options available. Land given to builders on 15 years installment ... no stake of builder.

    Man I have my doubts about your claim.

    Rohit

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta


    Let me try & clarify a couple of points even though I know its of no use for u

    1) Authority aquired land in GNW invoking emergency clause for industrial use. So it was not as if somebody forcefully snatched the land. The land was aquired
    2) As per UP Industrial Act, Authority incharge of the said area can change the land use post aquisition provided they earmark same % of land for the original land use some where else
    3) You have many times cited the reason of Shahberi verdict of SC to try & bolster ur angst filled posts against GNW. For your information, Shahberi land aquisition was cancelled not because of urgency clause or change in land use, but because only 23% of orginal title holders had taken compensation. Also you might not be too delighted to know that authority has already started the process for reaquiring Shahberi land and they have sent the file for approval to UP govt.

    I am sure u wudnt change ur views but atelast on facts, ur comments don't hold any water. Apart from the above if u have some other points, v wud surely like to hear them.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by leo1609
    Let me try & clarify a couple of points even though I know its of no use for u

    1) Authority aquired land in GNW invoking emergency clause for industrial use. So it was not as if somebody forcefully snatched the land. The land was aquired
    2) As per UP Industrial Act, Authority incharge of the said area can change the land use post aquisition provided they earmark same % of land for the original land use some where else
    3) You have many times cited the reason of Shahberi verdict of SC to try & bolster ur angst filled posts against GNW. For your information, Shahberi land aquisition was cancelled not because of urgency clause or change in land use, but because only 23% of orginal title holders had taken compensation. Also you might not be too delighted to know that authority has already started the process for reaquiring Shahberi land and they have sent the file for approval to UP govt.

    I am sure u wudnt change ur views but atelast on facts, ur comments don't hold any water. Apart from the above if u have some other points, v wud surely like to hear them.


    Good one so has the authority has earmarked same percentage of land for industry at the time of changing the land use.
    They have not .. so it is simple case of criminal conspiracy where authority builder and buyers have connived to grab the land at much less cost to benefit themselves.

    Rohit

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by rohit_warren
    Good one so has the authority has earmarked same percentage of land for industry at the time of changing the land use.
    They have not .. so it is simple case of criminal conspiracy where authority builder and buyers have connived to grab the land at much less cost to benefit themselves.

    Rohit

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta


    Rohit

    What's wrong with you?
    Do you know what you are writing? are you above Court?

    Have some rest...
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by rohit_warren
    Good one so has the authority has earmarked same percentage of land for industry at the time of changing the land use.
    They have not .. so it is simple case of criminal conspiracy where authority builder and buyers have connived to grab the land at much less cost to benefit themselves.

    Rohit

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta


    yes sir, pls check MP 2021. If they wouldn't have earmarked land for industrial use, they would not have been able to change the land use in the first place and secondly NCRPB would not have approved the master plan.

    Pls Google / research a bit before posting or trying to counter facts dude. Replying to rhetoric takes away all the fun of serious discussion :)
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by leo1609
    yes sir, pls check MP 2021. If they wouldn't have earmarked land for industrial use, they would not have been able to change the land use in the first place and secondly NCRPB would not have approved the master plan.

    Pls Google / research a bit before posting or trying to counter facts dude. Replying to rhetoric takes away all the fun of serious discussion :)

    Leo1609 Bro

    I have become your fan because of your this attitude "Seedhi Baat No Bakwas":bab (35):
    CommentQuote

  • , just anything for sake of arguing ....

    For general benefit

    Greater Noida Master Plan 2021

    Greater Noida Master Plan 2021 Map/Layout

    Note two points
    1. After going through HC ordered NCR-PB approval, GN MP2021 has semi-legal status, so cannot be easily changed in future.
    2. Shear size of the proposed future acquisition, may be three times the current GNoida (both main & West combined), once Union Land Acquisition Bill becomes law, that will be modified to a new UP land acquisition (land is state subject) and then another round of acquisition may start.



    Please do continue your

    Originally Posted by rohit_warren
    Good one so has the authority has earmarked same percentage of land for industry at the time of changing the land use.
    They have not .. so it is simple case of criminal conspiracy where authority builder and buyers have connived to grab the land at much less cost to benefit themselves.
    Rohit
    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by Pradyot1315sqf
    Trial Bhai....... where r u?

    waiting for your weekly survey report...........


    naa bhai couldnt do much survey this week apart from inspecting both ends of 130m wide road .... will resume weekly report next week
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by cookie
    Leo1609 Bro

    I have become your fan because of your this attitude "Seedhi Baat No Bakwas":bab (35):


    Ha ha ha cookie bhai, I'm flattered :)
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by dtw_Rajeev


    Originally Posted by FieldWorker
    Could you please help me to know........
    1) If resale is stopped in the NE by builders.
    Correct, as of now no resale in NExtn.

    2) If Yes, then what is the reason and your view on how you see resolving it.
    Unsold inventory is the reason, only when builders have sold their inventories, the resale will open. Considering the huge number of flats in NExtn, it will simply depend on builder to builder.





    Thanks bro,

    Why stop resale when you can make money by transfer charges. Unsold inventory will any way have different sort of takers then the resale market.

    Those who have cash, go for resale market and and those with limited cash and bankable portfolio prefer direct booking.

    What am i missing here ?


    FieldWorker, Cookie Bhai,

    Please help me sort out my queries about NE....
    CommentQuote


  • Old Greater Noida Master Plan 2021

    Just check out that there were huge residential zones right in the middle of the current NExtn, many current sectors like 1, 2 & 3 and so on were always residential (though for plots).

    Generally only for current sector 4 and sector 16, there is land conversion from industrial to residential and in lieu of that Sectors along the railway line are converted from residential to industrial. Makes perfect sense, let people live closer to Noida, Main GN and Ghaziabad.

    News flash looks attractive when it says "industrial to residential and hand over to builder". Even it was true, authority has done it's homework well within older master plan in light of British time land acquisition act.

    What authority used to do, was acquire land and let it lie useless for few years to make it free from any legal issue. BMW simply skipped this "sleeping period", so after this sleeping period of 5 years or so is over, all will be well in NExtn. Supreme Court is exactly doing that tiding over "sleeping period", after that compensation as per HC judgement and no more acquisition as per older law, start afresh.




    Originally Posted by FieldWorker


    For general benefit

    Greater Noida Master Plan 2021

    Greater Noida Master Plan 2021 Map/Layout

    Note two points
    1. After going through HC ordered NCR-PB approval, GN MP2021 has semi-legal status, so cannot be easily changed in future.
    2. Shear size of the proposed future acquisition, may be three times the current GNoida (both main & West combined), once Union Land Acquisition Bill becomes law, that will be modified to a new UP land acquisition (land is state subject) and then another round of acquisition may start.



    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by dtw_Rajeev
    FieldWorker, Cookie Bhai,

    Please help me sort out my queries about NE....

    Resale is Builder's prerogative. There are many Builder also in Noida which don't allow resale.
    Builder are not allowing resale because They have to sell their inventory 1st since old booking were made at the rate of 1600 and so..

    I Give you one example, One builder is allowing resale only after buyer makes 80 percent payment.
    need to read BBA for that.

    New Buyer is pretty much aware of this thing(resale) and There are buyers.:)
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by cookie
    Resale is Builder's prerogative. There are many Builder also in Noida which don't allow resale.
    Builder are not allowing resale because They have to sell their inventory 1st since old booking were made at the rate of 1600 and so..

    I Give you one example, One builder is allowing resale only after buyer makes 80 percent payment.
    need to read BBA for that.

    New Buyer is pretty much aware of this thing(resale) and There are buyers.:)


    So basically builders are scared of that resale markets might blow away the price hype created by them. 1600 wale can obviously sale it at much lower rate than the builder and still book the profit. But isn't it the case everywhere in NCR. Even D-EX projects are cheaper by 1000-1500 in resale market but builders haven't stopped resale and people are also buying in fresh.

    Do NE builder fear that investor/end user might sale in panic and difference b/w fresh and resale rate will be bigger and might be good enough to crash the market ?

    Has this "no resale" clause has come in fashion recently or it was there from the beginning? If no then how Builder are enforcing no resale to old buyers?
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by dtw_Rajeev
    So basically builders are scared of that resale markets might blow away the price hype created by them. 1600 wale can obviously sale it at much lower rate than the builder and still book the profit. But isn't it the case everywhere in NCR. Even D-EX projects are cheaper by 1000-1500 in resale market but builders haven't stopped resale and people are also buying in fresh.

    Do NE builder fear that investor/end user might sale in panic and difference b/w fresh and resale rate will be bigger and might be good enough to crash the market ?

    Has this "no resale" clause has come in fashion recently or it was there from the beginning? If no then how Builder are enforcing no resale to old buyers?

    Dwarka Expressway rates has not just doubled in 1-2 years alone. While in case of greater noida it has been.

    By the way, All terms and conditions are mentioned in BBA. we do read BBA before we sign, don't we?

    Many builders in Gurgaon too have some resale conditions. Projects in Gurgaon sold at pre launch, not in Greater noida west.
    CommentQuote
  • Looks like most of the Neharpar people spending time on NE threads to bash it...this is perfect example what Neharpar end users will face when they move there...live with all bashers and negativity all around...more depressed people and more suicides etc :)

    Welcome to NE thread..people who are forward looking and where steps are taken to make place beautiful. Authority works to repair roads and not like huda who leaves endusers to apathy and investors building hype to sell and exit. Ask people living in Faridabad sectors what happens before you start singing song.



    Originally Posted by dtw_Rajeev
    So basically builders are scared of that resale markets might blow away the price hype created by them. 1600 wale can obviously sale it at much lower rate than the builder and still book the profit. But isn't it the case everywhere in NCR. Even D-EX projects are cheaper by 1000-1500 in resale market but builders haven't stopped resale and people are also buying in fresh.

    Do NE builder fear that investor/end user might sale in panic and difference b/w fresh and resale rate will be bigger and might be good enough to crash the market ?

    Has this "no resale" clause has come in fashion recently or it was there from the beginning? If no then how Builder are enforcing no resale to old buyers?
    CommentQuote