पतवाड़ी के किसानों का लिखित समझौता
जागरण संवाददाता, ग्रेटर नोएडा किसानों के साथ समझौते की दिशा में ग्रेटर नोएडा प्राधिकरण को बृहस्पतिवार को बड़ी सफलता हासिल हुई। पतवाड़ी गांव के किसानों के साथ प्राधिकरण का समझौता हो गया। इससे बिल्डरों व निवेशकों को बहुत बड़ी राहत मिली है। समझौता भी किसानों के लिए फायदेमंद रहा। उन्हें अब 550 रुपये प्रति वर्गमीटर अतिरिक्त मुआवजा देने पर सहमति बन गई है। साथ ही आबादी व बैकलीज की शर्तो को हटा लिया गया है। हालांकि नोएडा के सेक्टर-62 में गुरुवार को देर रात तक अन्य मुद्दों पर प्राधिकरण व किसानों के बीच बातचीत जारी थी। इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने 19 जुलाई को पतवाड़ी गांव की 589 हेक्टयेर जमीन का अधिग्रहण रद कर दिया था। अधिग्रहण रद होने से सात बिल्डरों के प्रोजेक्ट प्रभावित हुई हुए थे। 26 हजार निवेशकों के फ्लैट का सपना भी टूट गया था। प्राधिकरण के ढाई हजार भूखंड़ों, चार सौ निर्मित मकानों व दो इंजीनियरिंग कॉलेज की योजना भी अधर में लटक गई थी। 26 जुलाई को हाईकोर्ट ने नोएडा एक्सटेंशन के अन्य गांवों की सुनवाई के दौरान प्राधिकरण, बिल्डर व किसानों को 12 अगस्त तक आपस में समझौते करने का सुझाव दिया था। हाईकोर्ट के सुझाव पर प्राधिकरण ने किसानों से समझौते के लिए वार्ता की पहल शुरू की। 27 जुलाई को प्राधिकरण के सीईओ रमा रमन ने सबसे पहले पतवाड़ी गांव के प्रधान को पत्र भेज कर वार्ता करने के लिए आमंत्रित किया। दूसरे दिन ग्राम प्रधान रेशपाल यादव ने प्राधिकरण कार्यालय पहुंच कर सीईओ से बातचीत कर उनका रुख जानने का प्रयास किया था। 30 जुलाई को सीईओ ने गांव पतवाड़ी जाकर किसानों से सामूहिक रूप में बात की। इस दौरान मुआवजा वृद्धि को छोड़कर किसानों के साथ अन्य मांगों पर प्राधिकरण ने सकारात्मक रुख दिखाया। मुआवजा बढ़ोतरी पर बातचीत करने के लिए किसानों को आपस में कमेटी गठित कर वार्ता का प्रस्ताव सीईओ दे आए थे। इसके बाद किसानों के साथ गुरुवार को नोएडा के सेक्टर-62 में बैठक बुलाई गई। इसमें प्राधिकरण के सीईओ रमा रमन, ग्रामीण अभियंत्रण मंत्री जयवीर ठाकुर, सांसद सुरेंद्र सिंह नागर व जिलाधिकारी के साथ किसानों की वार्ता शुरू हुई। आठ घंटे तक वार्ता चलने के बाद किसान समझौते के लिए तैयार हो गए। सूत्रों के अनुसार पतवाड़ी गांव के किसानों को मिले 850 रुपये प्रति वर्गमीटर के अलावा 550 रुपये प्रति वर्गमीटर और देने पर सहमति बन गई है। देर रात तक बैठक जारी थी। अभी इसकी अधिकारिक घोषणा नहीं की गई है। हालांकि गांव के कुछ किसानों ने वार्ता की पुष्टि की है। इससे पूर्व किसानों की आबादी को पूरी तरह से अधिग्रहण मुक्त रखा जाएगा। बैकलीज की शर्ते हटा ली जाएगी। पतवाड़ी गांव का समझौता होने पर प्राधिकरण को नोएडा एक्सटेंशन के अन्य गांवों में किसानों के साथ समझौता करने की राह आसान हो गई है। नोएडा एक्सटेंशन विवाद ने रोके खरीददार : नोएडा एक्सटेंशन विवाद ने समूचे ग्रेटर नोएडा एवं यमुना एक्सप्रेस वे प्राधिकरण क्षेत्र में संपत्तियों की खरीद-फरोख्त पर ब्रेक लगा दिया है। दोनों जगह ढूंढे से भी खरीददार नहीं मिल रहे हैं। कुछ समय पहले तक जो लोग शहर में अपना आशियाना बनाने के लिए आतुर थे, वे अब यहां संपत्ति खरीदने से हिचकिचा रहे हंै। पिछले बीस दिनों में भूखंड व मकानों की गिनी-चुनी रजिस्ट्री हुई हैं। सिर्फ गांवों में कृषि व आबादी भूमि की रजिस्ट्री हो रही है। इससे प्रदेश सरकार को राजस्व की भी हानि उठानी पड़ रही है
-Dainik Jagran.
Read more
Reply
16355 Replies
Sort by :Filter by :
  • Originally Posted by neha2006sh
    Actually in NCR no where is safe, if now SC gives decision in favour of farmers, later Noida Sector farmers, then Gurgaon Farmers, Expressway farmers, Main Greater noida farmers and so on they will keep on rising and this would never end.

    SC should atleast look at the long term impacts of their decision & also plan who should be responsible then and who will pay?

    Also they should take into account the net worth of compensation amount. If farmer has taken 1 lakh compensation 10 years back it is worth around 4-5 lakhs now.

    Who is the lawyer from our side, if anyone knows, please suggest him to raise this point.


    Speaking on personal account, I know someone from haryana whose land is acquired, they got 3cr as compensation.
    They bought two scorpio, three plots in rohini, built two plots. Moved in one rented the other. Third one is still lying vacant. Their montly expenses are met with rent, income from job is saved. Their lifestyle looks like a middle class person, good behaviour with neighbors.

    On other hand their is a family from GNW, I don't know personally but hear from colleague. Got compensation of 5cr.
    They bought flat in delhi, way above market price, moved there. Bought two high end cars worth 1cr. Spent 1cr in marriage. Always creating trouble for neighbors. When left with 50-60 lakhs, they jumped the legal bandwagon for enhanced compensation.

    That's the root of trouble
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by spring121
    Speaking on personal account, I know someone from haryana whose land is acquired, they got 3cr as compensation.
    They bought two scorpio, three plots in rohini, built two plots. Moved in one rented the other. Third one is still lying vacant. Their montly expenses are met with rent, income from job is saved. Their lifestyle looks like a middle class person, good behaviour with neighbors.

    On other hand their is a family from GNW, I don't know personally but hear from colleague. Got compensation of 5cr.
    They bought flat in delhi, way above market price, moved there. Bought two high end cars worth 1cr. Spent 1cr in marriage. Always creating trouble for neighbors. When left with 50-60 lakhs, they jumped the legal bandwagon for enhanced compensation.

    That's the root of trouble


    That's why SC should think before jumping to decision for extra compensation.
    Money provided to these people is someone's hard earned money. SC need to re-look, why no-one among authorities, builders, etc. are held responsible? Is only end user responsible to pay?
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by spring121
    After SC they can't go anywhere but can always block roads etc.


    Then SC should ban such activities & direct police to take strict actions, when they have got such high compensation.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by neha2006sh
    Then SC should ban such activities & direct police to take strict actions, when they have got such high compensation.







    problem is police is not under sc control. And you are talking about UP Police.








    Sent from my Lumia 800 using Tapatalk
    CommentQuote
  • Friends .. I found the full High Court judgement of 22nd Oct 2011 on this weblink .. one very interesting part in that judgement is as follows :
    http://rajputsk.blogspot.com/

    "The payment of adequate compensation for acquisition of land is also the important aspect of the whole exercise. One aspect of compensation, in the shape of payment of additional compensation with regard to land holders of village Patwari needs to be noted. As noted above, the Division Bench while passing the order dated 26.7.2007 for hearing of the matter by larger Bench has left open to the petitioners, State and Authority to make an effort of settlements. After order of this Court dated 26.7.2011, the Authority took steps and invited the land holders of village Patwari to arrive at a settlement. The Authority has filed a supplementary affidavit in the main writ petition giving details of facts and events which took place towards the settlement between the authority and the land owners regarding payment of additional compensation. In the supplementary affidavit it has been brought on record by the Authority in the main writ petition that an agreement was entered between the land owners of village Patwari and Authority by which it was agreed that an additional compensation of Rs. 550/- per square meter be given to the land owners of village Patwari in addition to the compensation which was paid under agreement to the villagers. In village Patwari the payment of additional compensation at the rate of Rs.550/- per square meter has already been made after 26.7.2011.Some of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner with regard to other villages have submitted that although land owners of the village Patwari were called for negotiation and agreement but Authority have not called land owners of other villages for negotiation and payment of additional compensation. The amount of Rs. 550/- per square meter which has been offered and paid by the Authority in village Patwari is on the basis of negotiation and on the basis of settlement, the compensation which was paid to the residents of village Patwari under agreement was Rs. 850/- per square meter and the additional compensation which is now being paid is Rs. 550/- per square meter which comes to about 64.70% of the compensation paid earlier under the 1997 Rules. In the facts of the present case when the additional compensation has been paid to the resident of village Patwari after arriving a settlement by the Authority and farmers which indicate that in payment of additional compensation the Authority itself has agreed to pay additional compensation, we are of the view that the petitioners of other villages whose land has been acquired for the same purpose and who are the petitioners before us are also entitled for additional compensation."


    -----

    Does this mean all projects which come under Patwari village (i think its Techzone IV) have a better chance of being cleared by Supreme Court (since Patwari farmers had already taken additional compensation way back in 2011 itself ) ??

    I would request any legal experts on IREF to please give their views on this matter
    CommentQuote
  • Anybody knows in which village supertech eco village 2 is ?
    I am searching on web but unable to find?
    CommentQuote
  • Trail Bhai , Please help if know ?
    CommentQuote
  • Do you guys really think that venting our anger and frustration here on the forum will fetch any results??
    The ground reality is that we are stuck here and have nowhere to go. Just wait for the SC ruling and lets pray that it is not in favor of the farmers.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by parveenshar
    Do you guys really think that venting our anger and frustration here on the forum will fetch any results??
    The ground reality is that we are stuck here and have nowhere to go. Just wait for the SC ruling and lets pray that it is not in favor of the farmers.


    Intention is not about venting our anger. Its just about being well informed as our interests are at stake.
    CommentQuote
  • Can someone please share case number of this present case ... ?
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by spring121
    Can someone please share case number of this present case ... ?


    Special Leave Petition (SLP) 30969 of year 2011
    (all cases of GNW in SC have been clubbed under this 30969 case number)
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by trialsurvey
    Friends .. I found the full High Court judgement of 22nd Oct 2011 on this weblink .. one very interesting part in that judgement is as follows :
    My Views...

    "The payment of adequate compensation for acquisition of land is also the important aspect of the whole exercise. One aspect of compensation, in the shape of payment of additional compensation with regard to land holders of village Patwari needs to be noted. As noted above, the Division Bench while passing the order dated 26.7.2007 for hearing of the matter by larger Bench has left open to the petitioners, State and Authority to make an effort of settlements. After order of this Court dated 26.7.2011, the Authority took steps and invited the land holders of village Patwari to arrive at a settlement. The Authority has filed a supplementary affidavit in the main writ petition giving details of facts and events which took place towards the settlement between the authority and the land owners regarding payment of additional compensation. In the supplementary affidavit it has been brought on record by the Authority in the main writ petition that an agreement was entered between the land owners of village Patwari and Authority by which it was agreed that an additional compensation of Rs. 550/- per square meter be given to the land owners of village Patwari in addition to the compensation which was paid under agreement to the villagers. In village Patwari the payment of additional compensation at the rate of Rs.550/- per square meter has already been made after 26.7.2011.Some of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner with regard to other villages have submitted that although land owners of the village Patwari were called for negotiation and agreement but Authority have not called land owners of other villages for negotiation and payment of additional compensation. The amount of Rs. 550/- per square meter which has been offered and paid by the Authority in village Patwari is on the basis of negotiation and on the basis of settlement, the compensation which was paid to the residents of village Patwari under agreement was Rs. 850/- per square meter and the additional compensation which is now being paid is Rs. 550/- per square meter which comes to about 64.70% of the compensation paid earlier under the 1997 Rules. In the facts of the present case when the additional compensation has been paid to the resident of village Patwari after arriving a settlement by the Authority and farmers which indicate that in payment of additional compensation the Authority itself has agreed to pay additional compensation, we are of the view that the petitioners of other villages whose land has been acquired for the same purpose and who are the petitioners before us are also entitled for additional compensation."


    -----

    Does this mean all projects which come under Patwari village (i think its Techzone IV) have a better chance of being cleared by Supreme Court (since Patwari farmers had already taken additional compensation way back in 2011 itself ) ??

    I would request any legal experts on IREF to please give their views on this matter


    Patwari village the first village in Noida Extension which has done settlment with authority and based on Patwari settlment (done with Mr. Surender Nagar, Authority officers & Patwari pradhan Tejpal OR Rampal I guess) they come up with additional componsation and 10% develop land. 87.5% farmers have taken componsation at that time (2011) and almost 80% have taken additional componsation... PLS READ FIRST POST OF THIS THREAD FOR DETAILS.

    Projects under Patwari Village khasra numbers

    Sector 2 Plot
    Partial Sector 3 plots and buildup house
    Partial Techzone IV (Amrapali Dream Valley, Eross Sampoornam, Cherry county etc)
    partial sector 1 (2-3 projects including EV)
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by fritolay_ps
    Patwari village the first village in Noida Extension which has done settlment with authority and based on Patwari settlment (done with Mr. Surender Nagar, Authority officers & Patwari pradhan Tejpal OR Rampal I guess) they come up with additional componsation and 10% develop land. 87.5% farmers have taken componsation at that time (2011) and almost 80% have taken additional componsation... PLS READ FIRST POST OF THIS THREAD FOR DETAILS.

    Projects under Patwari Village khasra numbers

    Sector 2 Plot
    Partial Sector 3 plots and buildup house
    Partial Techzone IV (Amrapali Dream Valley, Eross Sampoornam, Cherry county etc)
    partial sector 1 (2-3 projects including EV)


    any idea if Amrapali Leisure Valley and Verona Heights also comes under Patwari ?
    CommentQuote
  • Khasra wise, leisure valley belongs to Ethehra village and biggest block of techzone/sector 1 from Bisrakh. Gaur city and rest of part of land from left side of first gol chakkar belongs to Haibatpur/Shahberi and two more villages till sector 16b/c
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by spring121
    Kahan loge bhai count me in too.



    I m considering crossing republic now...

    Sent from my Micromax A77 using Tapatalk
    CommentQuote