Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

Collapse
X
Collapse

Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

Last updated: May 30 2019
422 | Posts
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

    Latest news on Gurgaon/Manesar/NCR page 691 . The news of fir of son in law of arun nehru sh. madan and family of brahma management. in this indianrealestate forum itself.

    Comment


    • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

      Thanks for the information - It does state Krrish as the original licence holder but it is named Brahma City so the onus is shared. The sections are also including 420 which is very strong for an FDI funding. Lets wait what disclaimer comes from the insiders.

      Comment


      • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

        This is a simple case where a customer who is not getting refund from the company is making false acquisitions. Mr mewa singh booked 2 plots in brahma city in 2012 through future capital group . He had paid 41 lacs for each plot, looking at the market he decided to take a refund which is against the co policy . The company has a policy of forfeiture, to get away he started to put these allegations . There is no land grab here as half of the township is in collaboration with the farmers , the license clearly mentions all the names . It is available online . Krish buildtech , brahma city , and at atleast 50 others .

        Comment


        • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

          Well it does not seem a disgruntled customer from the report but a land owner.

          Comment


          • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

            The issue of refund is to be taken by consumer court and why by court and fir for investigation. Moreover krrish was ready to returned booking amt. with interst also due to oversold or for greed.He has even issued notices.

            Brahma now a stackholder of krrish plots/ABW plots,floors/brahma plots,miracle has not launched officially.Wheather he has deposited edc to HUDA as even he has not started development of layout,internal roads etc. for idc taken as well considering progress of Anant raj in sector 63A plots/floors.

            Licence is upto 2014 so this forum pl. suggest for a visit to offices of each 3 developers.

            Comment


            • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

              can you please tell me for what plots the fraud FIR has been lodged?

              is it same brahma city in which the miracle mile is also a part?

              Comment


              • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

                Moderators are requested not to ban Rahulsaxena7 as we at least get the "insider" information and what Brahma has to say from his post. :-)

                Comment


                • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

                  Arun Nehru's relatives named in land grab FIR
                  By Ajay Kumar
                  The Gurgaon police has registered a case against six persons, including former Cabinet minister Arun Nehru's daughter, son-in-law and grandson, for their alleged involvement in fraudulently grabbing 151 acre of land from farmers and later selling it to investors.
                  The case came to light when the complainant - Mewa Singh - lodged a complaint in a court, which then directed the local police on October 3 to register an FIR against M/s Brahma City Pvt Ltd, the company owned by Nehru's son-in-law, and its top officials.

                  More...

                  Gulbir Singh Madan, Nehru's son-in-law, has been accused of fraudulently taking 151 acre of lands from farmers of Ulhawas village and taking housing license from the Town and Country Planning department in the name of his company, then known as Krish Buildtech Pvt Ltd, in 2010.
                  The FIR, which was lodged at the Sadar police station, alleges that Bramha City Pvt Ltd sold the land to more than 1,000 buyers at retail price.

                  Comment


                  • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

                    Originally posted by redwine_sing View Post
                    Arun Nehru's relatives named in land grab FIR
                    By Ajay Kumar
                    The Gurgaon police has registered a case against six persons, including former Cabinet minister Arun Nehru's daughter, son-in-law and grandson, for their alleged involvement in fraudulently grabbing 151 acre of land from farmers and later selling it to investors.
                    The case came to light when the complainant - Mewa Singh - lodged a complaint in a court, which then directed the local police on October 3 to register an FIR against M/s Brahma City Pvt Ltd, the company owned by Nehru's son-in-law, and its top officials.

                    More...

                    Gulbir Singh Madan, Nehru's son-in-law, has been accused of fraudulently taking 151 acre of lands from farmers of Ulhawas village and taking housing license from the Town and Country Planning department in the name of his company, then known as Krish Buildtech Pvt Ltd, in 2010.
                    The FIR, which was lodged at the Sadar police station, alleges that Bramha City Pvt Ltd sold the land to more than 1,000 buyers at retail price.
                    Why the grandson?? Is he also a director? Our banned friends may have been able to comment on this.

                    Comment


                    • Re : Brahma Commercial in Sector 60 GCX Miracle Mile Gurgaon

                      ARUN NEHRU’s FORMER CABINET MINISTER KIN AND QTTAVIO QUATTROCHI RELATIVES BOOKED FOR FRAUD, CHEATING, FORGERY.

                      ARUN NEHRU’s FORMER CABINET MINISTER KIN AND QTTAVIO QUATTROCHI RELATIVES BOOKED FOR FRAUD, CHEATING, FORGERY.

                      The Gurgaon Police has registered a criminal case under section 420, 406, 120-B/34 IPC against six persons including former Cabinet Minister Arun Nehru’s daughter, son-in-law and grandsons and also relative of Mr.Qttavio Quattrochi, for their alleged involments in fraudulently grabbing 151 Acres of land from farmers and later selling it to investors.

                      The case came to light when the complainant Mr.Mewa Singh – lodged a complaint in a court, which then directed the local police on October 3,2013 to register an FIR No.674 against M/s. Brahma City Pvt.Ltd, the company owned by Nehru’s son-in-law, daughter & grandsons of Mr.Gulbir Singh Madan and Mrs. Avantika Nehru Madan and Akhil Kumar Nehru and its top officials.

                      Gulbir Singh Madan, Nehru’s son-in-law and relative of Mr.Qttavio Quattrochi, has been accused of fraudulently taking 151 acres of land from farmers of Ulhawas and nearby villages and taking residential license from the Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana, in the name of his company then known as M/s.Krrish Buildtech Pvt.Ltd; in 2010.

                      The FIR which was lodged at the Sadar Police Station, Gurgaon, alleges that M/s. Brahma City Pvt.Ltd; sold the land to more than 1000 buyers at retails price and fraud and cheating to the investors and farmers more than of Rs.70.00 thousand of crores of rupees from Public Funds. Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s and his daughter Mrs. Avantika Nehru Madan and grandson Mr.Akhilesh Nehru illegal action have exposed the company to serval violations of the Companies Act, 1956 and also FEMA Regulations, 1999 owing to irregularities and mismanagement of the Company

                      The son-in-law, daughters of Former Cabinet Minister Mr. Arun Nehru founder of various companies and also Directors of various companies floated by the son-in-law, daughter & grandsons of Former Cabinet Minister Mr. Arun Nehru under different name and different countries. That period of about one year has already rolled by and there is no possibility for launching the said project. It is prima facie clear cut that the aforesaid persons had conspired and exhorted the money under the grab of allotment of plots and commercial markets deceitfully by giving false assurance for allotment of plots and shops without having least arrangement for the same and thereby they have grabbed of appx. Of Rs.70,000/- crores of the public for allotment of plot and shops with dishonest and fraudulent intension. Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s and his daughter Mrs. Avantika Nehru Madan and grandson Mr.Akhilesh Nehru illegal action have exposed the company to serval violations of the Companies Act, 1956 and also FEMA Regulations, 1999 owing to irregularities and mismanagement of the Company

                      TOTAL SCAMS OF RS.70,000 CRORES APPROXIMATELY BIGGER OF COMMON WEALTH GAMES.

                      THE SCAMES MASTER MIND PERSONS OF SON-IN-LAW MR.GULBIR SINGH MADAN JONU), DAUGHTER SMT.AVANTIKA NEHRU MADAN AND GRAND SONS MR.AKHIL KUMAR NEHRU’s OF FORMER CABINET MINISTER OF LATE SHRI ARUN NEHRU’s.
                      DATE & EVENTS

                      2006-07
                      Haryana Government decided acquiring the and issued Notification under section 4, 6 & 9 in the revenue estate of villages Maidawas, Kadarpur, Ullahwas and Nagli Umarpur, Tehsil Sohna, in District Gurgaon, Haryana.
                      13-3-08
                      M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd; was incorporated as a private limited company under the provisions of the Company Act 1956 under the name and style of M/s.Krrish Build Tech Pvt.Ltd;
                      2008-10
                      Mr. Amit Katyal and his company entered into collaboration agreements with the certain land owners in the revenue estate of villages Maidawas, Kadarpur, Ullahwas and Nagli Umarpur, Tehsil Sohna, in District Gurgaon, Haryana for setting up a residential township colony on the land after obtaining Licenses from the Directorate of Town & Country Planning, Haryana, and thereafter withdraw the Notification under section 4,6 & 9 by the Haryana Government. Further Mr.Amit Katyal and his company made signification efforts and deployed numerous resources to agglomerate vast tranches of land through collaborators in favor of Mr.Amit Katyal company. Mr.Amit Katyal and his company spent serval months and used political connections were successful in obtaining the License No.64 of 2010 of 151 acres of above said lands.
                      Oct.2009
                      Arun Nehru’s son-in-law Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, and daughter Mrs. Avantika Nehru Madan and his company M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd; meet with Mr.Amit Katyal and his company and expressed interest in investing in the equity.
                      3-6-10
                      An investment Agreement was executed both the parties against the aforesaid investment certain equity shares were allotted.
                      1-3-11
                      Certain disputes and difference which arose between both the parties i.e. Mr.Amit Katyal and the son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan for clearly demarcated and ascertained their interests and allocation in the development of aforesaid land.
                      15-2-12
                      Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s file a criminal cases and lodge a FIR No.12, dt.15-2-12 Police Station Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi under sections 34, 120-B, 406, 409, 420, 463, 467 and 471 of IPC in the name of Mr.Amit Katyal and his wife Mrs.Deepika Katyal. Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s serious allegations that Mr.Amit Katyal accused showed various copies of Sales-Deed, Power of Attorney’s, documents, maps, sketches representing that he has valid and marketable title of the lands free from any encumbrances and thus by using these forged documents. Mr.Amit Katyal further entered into agreements in the name of companies controlled by him like M/s.Krrish Realtech Pvt.Ltd; and accepted various payments from third parties for plots in the licensed lands and having issued receipts for payments and sale the plots of appx.116 acres and received the money from markets appx. Of Rs.25,000 thousand crores.
                      23-3-12
                      Mr.Amit Katyal file a criminal cases and lodge a FIR No.41, dt.23-3-12 Police Station Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi under sections 34, 120-B, 406, 408, 417, 418, 467 and 471 of IPC in the name of Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s and his daughter Mrs. Avantika Nehru Madan and grandson Mr.Akhilesh Nehru made serious allegations that Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s and his daughter Mrs. Avantika Nehru Madan and grandson Mr.Akhilesh Nehru illegal action have exposed the company to serval violations of the Companies Act, 1956 and also FEMA Regulations, 1999 owing to irregularities and mismanagement of the Company by Mr. Gulbir Singh Madan, son-in-law of Arun Nehru’s and his daughter Mrs. Avantika Nehru Madan and grandson Mr.Akhilesh Nehru.
                      DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASES
                      ARUN NEHRU’S SON-IN-LAW GULBIR SINGH MADAN AND DAUGHTER AVANTIKA NEHRU MADAN BOOKED GURGAON POLICE IN FRAUD, CHEATING FORGERY.

                      HIGH COURT, NEW DELHI

                      S.No.
                      Case No.
                      Nature of case
                      Court Name
                      1
                      Crl.M.C.No.978/12
                      Quashing petition under section 482 CRPC
                      Justice Pratibha Rani,
                      Court No.32, Delhi High Court, Delhi

                      2
                      Crl.M.C.No.1175/12
                      Quashing petition under section 482 CRPC
                      Justice Pratibha Rani,
                      Court No.32, Delhi High Court, Delhi

                      3
                      Crl.M.C.No.1236/12
                      Quashing petition under section 482 CRPC
                      Justice Pratibha Rani,
                      Court No.32, Delhi High Court, Delhi

                      4
                      Bail Application No . 421/2012
                      Anticipatory Bail under section 438
                      Justice A.K.Pathak,
                      Court No.30, Delhi High Court, Delhi
                      5
                      W.P.(Crl) 323/2012
                      Writ Petition
                      Justice A.K.Pathak,
                      Court No.30, Delhi High Court, Delhi

                      SAKET COURT, NEW DELHI

                      S.N
                      Case No.
                      Nature of case
                      Court Name
                      1
                      CC No.4775/1
                      Section 138 NI Act
                      Court of Sunil Beniwal, Ld., Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket Court, New Delhi.
                      2
                      CC No.4606/11
                      Section 138 NI Act
                      Court of Dhiraj Mittal, Ld., Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket Court, New Delhi.

                      PATIALA HOUSE COURT, NEW DELHI
                      S.N
                      Case No.
                      Nature of case
                      Court Name
                      1
                      CC-83/1/11
                      Criminal Complaint Case under section 200 CRPC
                      Court of Ms.Navita Kumari Bagha, Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi
                      2
                      CC-2/1/11
                      Criminal Complaint Case under section 200 CRPC
                      Court of Ms.Navita Kumari Bagha, Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi
                      3
                      CC-84/1/11
                      Section 340 Cr.P.C
                      Court of Ms.Navita Kumari Bagha, Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi
                      4
                      CC-85/1/11
                      Section 340 Cr.P.C
                      Court of Ms.Navita Kumari Bagha, Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi


                      DETAILS OF FIRs

                      S.N
                      FIR No.
                      Under Section
                      Court Name
                      1
                      12/12
                      409/120-B/ 471/ 420/ 34/ 463/ 406/467 IPC Police Station Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi.
                      CC No.83/1/11 in the Court of Ms.Navita Kumari Bagha, Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi
                      2
                      41/12
                      409/120-B/ 471/ 420/ 34/ 463/ 406/467 IPC Police Station Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi.
                      CC No.2/1/11 in the Court of Ms.Navita Kumari Bagha, Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi
                      3
                      674/13
                      420/406/120-B/34 PS Sadar Gurgaon
                      Court of Shri Rajesh Sharma, ACJM, Gurgaon.

                      GURGAON DISTRICT COURT GURGAON
                      S.N
                      Case No.
                      Background
                      1
                      Case Id 163511
                      Application u/s 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and orders u/s 9 for restraining Amit Katyal from creating any third party rights in the land.

                      COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI
                      S.N
                      Case Nos.
                      Party Name
                      Court
                      1
                      C.P.No.57(ND)/2011
                      Brahma City Pvt. Ltd,
                      Company Law Board, New Delhi
                      2
                      C.P.No.62(ND)/2011
                      Amit Katyal & Anr.
                      Company Law Board, New Delhi

                      PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT CHANDIGARH
                      S.N
                      Case No
                      Remarks
                      Court
                      1
                      C.W.P No.826,1467 & 1468 of 2011
                      Licence No.64 of 2010 for treating the Petition as PIL.
                      Court of Justice Jasbir Singh & Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg


                      TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING, HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

                      S.N
                      Licence
                      Remarks
                      Office
                      1
                      De-licence from Licence No.64 of 2010
                      Legal Notice given by various company/persons that the Licence No.64 of 2010 was illegally and unauthorisedly obtained.
                      Show-cause notice given by the DTC Hr.Chd to appear before Shri T.C.Gupta,IAS,DG,T&CP Hry.Chandigarh
                      2
                      Legal Notices
                      Legal notices/Letters/Public Notices in News Papers.
                      Both the directors differences had arisen.The project of implantation of residencial colony is getting delayed on a/c of differences



                      Transfer of licenses.
                      The State of Haryana lost crores of revenues in the form of stamp duty due to non-registration of the Collaboration Agreements which was compulsorily register able under sections 17(1)(b), 17(1)(c) and 17(1A) of the Registration Act, 1908. By issue of License No.64 of 2010 for 151.00 acres lands and entertaining applications from various persons and various company mainly M/s Krish Builtech Pvt Ltd; (now M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd); on behalf of Mr. Amit Katyal on the basis of the Collaboration Agreement with various farmers and various companies for the grant, renewal and permission to transfer the license on the said land, the DTCP aided and abetted the loss of Rs. 750.00 crores of revenues to the State exchequer. Entertaining the applications from M/s.Krish (now M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd for grant, renewal and transfer of the license was a gross illegality as per the provisions of section 49 of the Registration Act.

                      Rule 17 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Area Rules, 1976, mandates that the colonizer shall not transfer the license granted to him to any other person without the approval of the Director.

                      “17. Transfer of license [Section 24]

                      The colonizer shall not transfer the license granted to him under the rule 12 to any other person without the prior approval of the Director.”
                      There is no provision for transfer of colony license in the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. If there is no substantive provision in the parent Act to transfer license granted under section 3 (3) of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act of 1975, the Rules.

                      Framed thereunder cannot confer substantive powers permitting transfer of license upon the Director. Moreover, Rule 17 as quoted above cannot be construed to mean that the Director was conferred with the power to permit transfer of license granted to an existing licensee to another applicant. License is to the person and the grant of license depends upon several factors including the capacity of the applicant to develop a colony, which is assessed after inquiry by the Director under section 3 (2) of the Act. Transfer of a license granted under section 3 (3) is as misconceived and obnoxious as conceiving the transfer of a driving license, where the license is issued depending upon the person’s capability to drive. The person holding a driving license cannot be permitted to transfer his license to another person even with the permission of the Licensing Authority. The suitability of each applicant is to be adjudged on own merits for grant of the license. The license granted cannot be traded. Every person has to apply for the license after completing necessary formalities and payment of the prescribed fee. By allowing the transfer of license issued in the name of M/s Krish to M/s. Brahma City Pvt. Ltd, the DTCP willy-nilly created a black market for trading in licenses, where cronies are issued licenses which are later sold or transferred with “permission” of the authority for fat consideration to the real developers. The obnoxious and illegal practice of trading in licenses result in huge losses to the State exchequer in terms of the license fees foregone. The transfer fee is fixed at 10% of the original license fee.

                      Whether the one or the other or anywhere in the range between the two, this is a humungous scam and loot of public wealth by the vested political-bureaucratic-business nexus. The procedures governing grant of Colony Licenses under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 and Change in Land Use (CLU) permissions under the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 must be made completely transparent so that the profits or premium on account of grant of colony license or CLU permissions do not accrue to the middlemen. The person is licensed subject to fulfillment of laid down conditions including his capacity to develop the colony. Trading in licenses is a deliberate ploy to allow crony capitalists operating as middlemen to flourish and appropriate the market premium of the license. If the initial grant of licenses is by way of auctions, the most optimum price for the colony license would accrue to the State coffers. As part of State policy, some categories of end-consumers could be subsidized directly out of the auction proceeds of the licenses. If there is a true political will in bringing reforms in the Town & Country Planning Department, the details of a fair and transparent system like competitive bidding for grant of colony licenses or CLU permissions can be evolved without unfairly enriching the crony capitalists as in the case of discretionary allotments of natural resources like telecom spectrum, coal mines, natural gas etc. Thousands of crores of additional revenues would accrue to the State exchequer each year instead of to a select bunch of crony capitalists. Land is a natural resource and its market price is determined by its use controlled by the State Government. The grant of colony license or change in land use permission must be fair and transparent, so that it yields optimum benefits to the society and the premium is not cornered by a select bunch of crony capitalists acting in cahoots with the political-bureaucratic network. This response would be incomplete without quoting from the majority opinion of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on State policy regarding allocation of natural resources in the Special Reference No. 1 of 2012 under Article 143 (1) of the Constitution of India. The gist is captured in Para 149 of the opinion and a part of it is reproduced below,
                      149. ... However, when such a policy decision is not backed by a social or welfare purpose, and precious and scarce natural resources are alienated for commercial pursuits or profit maximizing private entrepreneurs, adoption of means other than those that are competitive and maximize revenue may be arbitrary and face the wrath of Article 14 of the Constitution. Hence, rather than prescribing or proscribing a method, we believe, a judicial scrutiny of methods of disposal of natural resources should depend on the facts and circumstances of each case, in consonance with the principles which we have culled out above. Failing which, the Court, in exercise of power of judicial review, shall term the executive action as arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable and capricious due to its antinomy with Article 14 of the Constitution.”

                      6.10 Mandatory Declaration of Non-Conflict of Interest by Public Servants
                      Section 300 (1) of The Companies Act, 1956 prohibits interested directors in a Company from participating or voting in the Board’s proceedings. Contravention attracts punishment with fine of up to fifty thousand rupees. The relevant sub-sections (1) and (4) of section 300 of the Companies Act, 1956 are reproduced below,-

                      “300. INTERESTED DIRECTOR NOT TO PARTICIPATE OR VOTE IN BOARD'S PROCEEDINGS

                      (1) No director of a company shall, as a director, take any part in the discussion of, or vote on, any contract or arrangement entered into, or to be entered into, by or on behalf of the company, if he is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, concerned or interested in the contract or arrangement ; nor shall his presence count for the purpose of forming a quorum at the time of any such discussion or vote ; and if he does vote, his vote shall be void.

                      (4) Every director who knowingly contravenes the provisions of this section shall be punishable with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees.”

                      Unfortunately, there is no such analogous statutory provision for public servants. As described in Chapter 4 of this Report, public servants benefited from consolidation proceedings by investing in the lands under consolidation. The other modus operandi was to become co-sharers of common lands by buying a share of it cheaply from co-sharers not in possession of any part of the common land. The initial investment is multiplied several times after a partition of the common land through revenue officers under their direct control. From holding a share of the common land, the public servants responsible for implementation of the land laws take possession of valuable specific Khasra numbers after the partition of the common land, multiplying their initial investments by several times. There are several cases where public servants with direct or indirect self-interest take active part in decision making under the Land Acquisition Act and preparation of Development Plans in controlled areas under the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963. This necessitates making the declaration of any direct or indirect conflict of self-interest mandatory for all public servants and further making any false declaration by public servants a penal offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

                      Advice to the Department of Town & Country Planning
                      The Department of Town & Country Planning had earlier earned a sharp rap on its knuckles in CWP No. 826 of 2011, M/s Aaliyah Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. & Others vs. State of Haryana & Others,(now Brahma City Pvt.Ltd) wherein the Hon’ble High Court vide judgment dated June 2, 2011 ordered that if any further colony license was to be granted to any builder, the Competent Authority shall look into that there was no violation of the provisions of Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 or any other statute. To overcome the adverse fallout of the judgment in CWP No. 826 of 2011, the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act of 1972 was amended with retrospective effect from the 30th of January, 1975 vide Haryana Act No. 20 of 2011 notified on the 19th of October, 2011, giving primacy to the interests of builders over farmers. All colony licenses granted to colonizers on agriculture lands in the past in violation of the Ceiling Act of 1972 were regularized with this sweeping retrospective amendment. The Department of Town & Country Planning was rightly advised in the impugned ordernot to grant or renew colony license or change in land-use permission in violation of the Consolidation Act of 1948 or the Land Ceiling Act of 1972 at least in the future.

                      DETAILS OF COMPANIES OWNED BY SON-IN-LAW OF ARUN NEHRU’S MR.GULBIR SINGH MADAN AND DAUGHTER MRS.AVANTIKA NEHRU MADAN AND GRANDSON OF MR.AKHILESH NEHRU.

                      INDIAN COMPANY

                      1. M/S.BRAHMA CITY PVT.LTD; 10th floor, Building No.5A, DLF Cyber City, Phase III, GURGAON.

                      2. M/S.BRAHA CENTRE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LTD; 10th floor, Building No.5A, DLF Cyber City, Phase III, GURGAON.

                      3. M/S.BRAHMA HOMES PVT. LTD; Narayan Manzil, 1507-09, 23
                      Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. HDFC Bank A/C No. 04822320000465)

                      4. M/S IBIZA DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD (INDIA), Narayan Manzil,
                      1507-09, 23 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi.

                      5. M/S.KRRISH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD, C-654 New Friends Colony, New Delhi-110065. (Takeover by M/s.Brahma City Pvt. Ltd

                      6. M/s. KRRISH BUILDTECH PVT. LTD; 1507-09 NARAIN MANZIL, 23 BRAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI or CORP.OFFICE; 406, 4TH FLOOR, ELEGANCE TOWER, 8 JASOLA DISTRICT CENTRE, NEW DELHI-110025. (Takeover by M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd

                      7. M/S.KRRISH REALTECH PVT.LTD; 1507-09 NARAIN MANZIL, 23 BRAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI OR CORP.OFFICE; 406, 4TH FLOOR, ELEGANCE TOWER, 8 JASOLA DISTRICT CENTRE, NEW DELHI-110025. (Takeover by M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd

                      8. M/S.BRAHMA KRRISH BUILDTECH PRIVATE LTD; 1507-09 NARAIN MANZIL, 23 BRAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI OR CORP.OFFICE; 406, 4TH FLOOR, ELEGANCE TOWER, 8 JASOLA DISTRICT CENTRE, NEW DELHI-110025. . (Takeover by M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd

                      9. M/S. Brahma Capital Advisory Services, Maker Chambers
                      VI, 5th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400021,
                      India Tel: +91 224 333 5888


                      FOREIGN COMPANY

                      10. M/S BRAHMA FUND, 15 EAST 69TH STREET 6A NEW YORK,
                      USA – 10021 PHONE; 001-917-622555, 001-212-3105500, EMAIL;
                      juno@brahmamgmt.com

                      11. M/S. BRAHMA OPPORTUNITIES LTD; C/O INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG, EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS. COMPANY REGISTRATION NO.C076058.

                      12. M/S.BRAHMA OPPORTUNITIES A LTD; C/O INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG, EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS.COMPANY REGISTRATION NO.C076025.

                      13. M/S. BRAHMA OPPORTUNITIES B LTD; C/O INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG, EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS. COMPANY REGISTRATION NO.C092416.

                      14. M/S. BRAHMA OPPORTUNITIES D LTD; C/O INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG, EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS. COMPANY REGISTRATION NO.C095390.

                      15. M/S. BRAHMA OPPORTUNITIES E LTD; C/O INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG, EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS. COMPANY REGISTRATION NO.C095393.

                      16. M/S. BRAHMA COMMUNICATION MUSIC LTD; C/O INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG, EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS. COMPANY REGISTRATION NO.C108061.

                      17 M/S. BRAHMA LONG EQUITY LTD; C/O INTERNATIONAL
                      MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG,
                      EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS.
                      COMPANY REGISTRATION NO.C097937.

                      18. M/S.JM ASIAN CYPRUS A LIMITED; 10, DIOMIDOUS STREET, ALPHA MEGA AKROPOLIS BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR OFFICE 401 CY-2024, NICOSI, CYPRUS.

                      19. M/S.NEPTUNE ASIAN CYPRUS A LTD; 10, DIOMIDOUS STREET, ALPHA MEGA AKROPOLIS BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR OFFICE 401 CY-2024, NICOSI, CYPRUS.

                      20. M/S. INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT (MAURITIUS) LTD; 4TH FLOOR LES CASCADES BLDG, EDITH CAVELL STREET, PORT LOUIS, REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS.

                      21. M/s. Brahma Management, 126 E 56th Street, 21st Floor,
                      New York, NY 10022, USA US Toll Free: # 1 800 200 7101 Tel: +1
                      212 310 5500.

                      DETAILS OF EFFECTED PERSONS LOOTED BY THE ARUN NEHRU’S KINS RECEIVED AS ON 15-10-2013.
                      S.N
                      Name & Addresses
                      Amounts
                      1
                      Shri Mewa Singh s/o Shri Thakur Singh, resident of House No.328, Sector-47, Gurgaon Haryana

                      Rs.82.00 lacs paid on 10-9-2012 through cheque of Indian Bank to M/s.Brahma City Pvt.Ltd; FIR No.674/13 PS Sadar Gurgaon.
                      2
                      Mr.Gaurav Chandok s/o Shri Shailander Chandok, resident of House No.D-103, Panchseel Enclave, New Delhi.
                      Rs.21.00 lacs paid on 12-9-2012 through RTGS-HDFC00004 FROM INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK TO M/S.BRAHMA CITY PVT.LTD;
                      3
                      Mr. Sanjay Khandelwal s/o Shri P.N. Khandelwal, resident of House No.G-42A, East of Kailash, New Delhi

                      Rs.25.00 lacs paid through cheque to M/S.BRAHMA CITY PVT.LTD
                      4
                      Mr.Vijender Pal Jain s/o Shri A.S.Jain, BG-3, LeelaEffcee
                      WAGHAWADI Road, Bhavnagar – 364002 Gujarat
                      Rs.41.00 lacs paid on 30-10-2012 through RTGS TO M/s.M/S.BRAHMA CITY PVT.LTD

                      5
                      M/s.K&T Realty Services Private Limited 111, Suncity Business Tower, Golf Course Road, Sector-54, Gurgaon Mr.Ravnish Kapoor, Director.
                      Rs.12.00 Crores paid TO M/s.M/S.BRAHMA CITY PVT.LTD




                      If any information more required please contact at any time to Mr. Mewa Singh, House No.328, Sector-47, Gurgaon – 122002 Haryana India, Email: vitafresh2007@gmail.com, Phone: +919899985030 & +919953908530

                      Originally posted by redwine_sing View Post
                      Latest news on Gurgaon/Manesar/NCR page 691 . The news of fir of son in law of arun nehru sh. madan and family of brahma management. in this indianrealestate forum itself.
                      Last edited October 16 2013, 10:30 PM.

                      Comment

                      Have any questions or thoughts about this?
                      Working...
                      X