Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse

NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

Last updated: 11 hours ago
21720 | Posts
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

    I think we are misreading today's interim order. The next hearing is on 1st of December, and will be presented in front of a new Bench. The original case CWP 8055-2008 is still in pending status as is shown in attachment.

    Though assigning near date is good and hopefully it will be decided soon (wishful thinking looking at timelines of such cases take elsewhere)
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

      Came across this list of cases (Pardon if posted earlier)

      To search for NPR cases, you can search for cases by Shailendra jain's (Litigant's lawyer) name
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

        Guys, don't fight among each other. We have to accept the failures of the HOODA government in successfully completing any of the major infra projects whether it was Gurgaon, Faridabad or other areas. I do not understand how one can start 100s of crores of projects without proper planning. They were always in hurry to launch these projects (without planning) so that the builders can benefit by mentioning them in the brochures and HOODA sahab can get his cut quickly.

        Now there is a category of people who also want to see things physically and not just brochures so to cash on them, they start executing the project (again without planning), notify stupid sections and start building without checking or resolving the litigation arising due to the notified sections.

        Out of 10kms of roads they make say 7 kms. of roads. Now builders can increase the rates by giving users lollipop of 7 kms of unusable road. Now HUDA's idiot lawyers are only buying time in the court, builder has sold his inventory at inflated rates so he is chilled out and end user is only dreaming that things would get fine within a few months. But they only get tareekhs and even after shifting to their homes, they are forced to use alternate revenue rastas or stupid narrow roads built by the builders.

        This has not just happened in NPR. This has happened in every damn infrastructure project initiated by the HOODA sarkar.
        Last edited by miketest; November 19 2014, 12:38 PM.

        Comment


        • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

          Originally posted by er.harjinder View Post
          Attached is the Court Order Copy of All the NPR Cases discussed today :

          As per the information received the Hon. High court has given a very near by next date for all the NPR cases connected with main case CWP 8055 of 2008 on 01-Dec-2014. It is very likely that some concrete resolution should come on 01-Dec-2014.

          A Major Good News is that Case CWP 8060 of 2008 connecting case is DISPOSED OF 18-NOV-2014...i.e. Today....Case order copy is yet to be uploaded, but writ petition of 2008 is DISPOSED OF today.

          Now facts and crystal clear truth is infront of everyone.....so no need to get into negative rumors being created :-) by some members.



          Again facts & only clear facts with full back up proofs....no nonsence...or false claims.....like some negativity being spread by some members !!

          Things have started moving fast in the right direction....

          Lets wait little more as the more good news might be just be around the corner !!

          Cheers !!
          Of-course its crystal clear now the facts as per attached order are:

          1. New case in 2014 filed and already mentioned in list which I made claim earlier.


          2. The application of HUDA has been dismissed and HC upheld earlier order.


          3. On 1-Dec-14 this case would be heard by other bench (most probably earlier bench) and than proceed further.

          4. Its evident that case of HUDA is quite weak despite that any resolution would take at-least 4-5 years in HC itself. Thereafter whoever loose may move to higher court.

          5. Who says that 8060 case is disposed off.... Please clarify.
          Sab 99 ka fer hain............

          Comment


          • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

            Originally posted by ultichakri View Post
            Of-course its crystal clear now the facts as per attached order are:

            1. New case in 2014 filed and already mentioned in list which I made claim earlier.

            Can you provide case number from the list please?
            2. The application of HUDA has been dismissed and HC upheld earlier order.
            Can you please provide details again? Is there some proof?

            3. On 1-Dec-14 this case would be heard by other bench (most probably earlier bench) and than proceed further.

            4. Its evident that case of HUDA is quite weak despite that any resolution would take at-least 4-5 years in HC itself. Thereafter whoever loose may move to higher court.How did you come to the conclusion that HUDA's case is weak? care to share?

            5. Who says that 8060 case is disposed off.... Please clarify.The picture posted by er.Harjinder says so. Seems pretty official to me
            Looking forward to some details
            Last edited by ashu_sharmaa; November 19 2014, 04:05 PM.

            Comment


            • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

              Originally posted by ashu_sharmaa View Post
              Looking forward to some details
              Carefully read HC order all are there.

              Point wise reply listed:

              1. The case no. itself listed as 9130-2014 though apart from this another cases are also filled which is being hearing separately (Those may clubbed later on)

              2. Refer last para whereas application by respondent no. 7 has been dismissed.

              3. NIL

              4. Whenever verdict delivered you may get why HUDA's case is weak, there is no point of lengthy discussion again.

              5. Where its listed that 8060 case is dispossed off and where is the HC order copy? And how its possible when next hearing is going on??
              Sab 99 ka fer hain............

              Comment


              • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

                Originally posted by ultichakri View Post
                Carefully read HC order all are there.

                Point wise reply listed:

                1. The case no. itself listed as 9130-2014 though apart from this another cases are also filled which is being hearing separately (Those may clubbed later on)Ok. Agree

                2. Refer last para whereas application by respondent no. 7 has been dismissed.Yes, because sequel to the matter will be placed before some
                other Bench. As that has already been ordered, this court is not taking a decision on it. 'Not taking a decision' is not the same as 'decision taken against HUDA'. These two are different. Let us be very clear about it. The key word is 'Infructuous'


                3. NIL

                4. Whenever verdict delivered you may get why HUDA's case is weak, there is no point of lengthy discussion again.so its just your opinion and without any proof. ok

                5. Where its listed that 8060 case is disposed off and where is the HC order copy? And how its possible when next hearing is going on??attaching the pic of judgement. Please refer to highlighted portion
                It says that a case has to be presented to a bench, which doesn't have Raj Rahul Garg, J. Does someone know who requested for the change to a bench without Raj Rahul Garg? Litigants or HUDA? Whoever did that will probably get an advantage
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

                  Originally posted by ashu_sharmaa View Post
                  It says that a case has to be presented to a bench, which doesn't have Raj Rahul Garg, J. Does someone know who requested for the change to a bench without Raj Rahul Garg? Litigants or HUDA? Whoever did that will probably get an advantage

                  1. The case no. itself listed as 9130-2014 though apart from this another cases are also filled which is being hearing separately (Those may clubbed later on)Ok. Agree

                  2. Refer last para whereas application by respondent no. 7 has been dismissed.Yes, because sequel to the matter will be placed before some
                  other Bench. As that has already been ordered, this court is not taking a decision on it. 'Not taking a decision' is not the same as 'decision taken against HUDA'. These two are different. Let us be very clear about it. The key word is 'Infructuous'


                  Judge can forward the application to new bunch with note, despite that its decided to dismissed plea. Further nowhere I said its against to anybody and action has already been taken when its dismissed calling infructuous anyway its doesn't make any difference here.
                  3. NIL

                  4. Whenever verdict delivered you may get why HUDA's case is weak, there is no point of lengthy discussion again.so its just your opinion and without any proof. ok

                  5. Where its listed that 8060 case is disposed off and where is the HC order copy? And how its possible when next hearing is going on??attaching the pic of judgement. Please refer to highlighted portion

                  The order has been passed and disposed off it refers to interim order not to final disposal off case which was pointing out.
                  Sab 99 ka fer hain............

                  Comment


                  • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

                    DPS at DEW is going to start hiring process also Click image for larger version

Name:	ImageUploadedByTapatalk1416403816.499704.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	88.7 KB
ID:	2246067

                    Comment


                    • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

                      Originally posted by ultichakri View Post

                      1. The case no. itself listed as 9130-2014 though apart from this another cases are also filled which is being hearing separately (Those may clubbed later on)Ok. Agree

                      2. Refer last para whereas application by respondent no. 7 has been dismissed.Yes, because sequel to the matter will be placed before some other Bench. As that has already been ordered, this court is not taking a decision on it. 'Not taking a decision' is not the same as 'decision taken against HUDA'. These two are different. Let us be very clear about it. The key word is 'Infructuous'

                      Judge can forward the application to new bunch with note, despite that its decided to dismissed plea. Further nowhere I said its against to anybody and action has already been taken when its dismissed calling infructuous anyway its doesn't make any difference here.well it is important to clarify that it is not against any party. Just that a decision is not taken. Else there is possibility of misinterpretation on this forum

                      3. NIL

                      4. Whenever verdict delivered you may get why HUDA's case is weak, there is no point of lengthy discussion again.so its just your opinion and without any proof. ok

                      5. Where its listed that 8060 case is disposed off and where is the HC order copy? And how its possible when next hearing is going on??attaching the pic of judgement. Please refer to highlighted portionThe order has been passed and disposed off it refers to interim order not to final disposal off case which was pointing out.where does it say that it is only interim?
                      Good news is that there is only one case in 2014. Its not as bad as it was made out to be, claiming that Multiple cases are filed
                      Last edited by ashu_sharmaa; November 19 2014, 08:53 PM.

                      Comment

                      Have any questions or thoughts about this?
                      Working...
                      X