Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse

NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

Last updated: 2 minutes ago
21879 | Posts
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

    Last and Final Warning



    If anybody has any issues with what a member is writing, please report the same, instead of slugging it out here & making off topic & personal comments .

    If somebody has an different POV, convey the same within the gambit of IREF rules . If you don't like others opinion..... SIMPLY MOVE ON .

    If anyone found getting involved in bickering, one-upmanship hereafter, face Suspension & worst .


    Thanks
    .




    Personal Feuds - Zero Tolerance Policy
    A personal feud can be defined as an ongoing, largely personal rather than issue-driven, reciprocal hostility between two members, or among three or more members in groups, whatever you wish to identify, wherein the primary focus is a flame war intended to undermine forum member reputations, and not to advance arguments on policy, philosophy, politics or other primary interests of our forum.

    Quote:
    Our Admins and moderators are not here to cast blame or choose sides. We can't be expected to research the pros and cons of your personal arguments with one another. We prefer that forum reputation be based on your commentary and dialogue on the issues of importance to all of us.

    Insults/Flaming
    IREF was put together for people to come together and help each other, collaborate and discuss in a positive way – not bash on someone because you don't like their idea, or because they don't share the same views as you. We are big into the free speech idea here. So you're free to say what you think – but do it in a constructive and positive way. We encourage mature debates – discourage childish arguments. Personal attacks, insults, rudeness, racism, threats, name calling or unnecessarily inflammatory posts will NOT be tolerated. Common courtesy, politeness and respect for fellow members, along with constructive posting of opinions are essential in preventing posts from being edited and/or deleted, or having threads locked. Whilst we encourage healthy disagreement/debate, please maintain respect towards fellow members at all times.

    Off Topic
    Please make every effort to keep your posts relevant to the active thread topic. Detours usually take a thread wildly off topic, and invite others to do the same. Off topic posts (and any responses to such posts) may be deleted without notice.
    Last edited by MANOJa; May 29 2015, 02:08 PM.
    Download our Android App! | Please Read IREF Rules | FAQ's

    Comment


    • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

      Court has already Disposed the case on 20 th may for your information ok.

      Comment


      • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

        Originally posted by Khalsa View Post
        Court has already Disposed the case on 20 th may for your information ok.
        Not all - there are still two more pending and where is the copy of final judgement? What happened in court today?

        I agree that settlement is reached with One group of new palam vihar but what about the other two cases?

        Rohit

        Comment


        • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

          Khalsa ji, can you please provide details of the remaining cases? Has the compensation been accepted?
          Last edited by Indiana; May 29 2015, 02:34 PM.

          Comment


          • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

            Indiana,
            Yes people's have accepted the compensation.
            See below court verdict.

            Diary Number 205099 District GURGAON
            Category 10.2-LAND ACQUISITION CASES Main Case Detail CWP-8055-2008
            Party Detail DEVASHISH CHAKARVARTY AND ORS. V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
            Advocate Name SHAILENDRA JAIN List Type REGULAR
            Status DISPOSED OF on 20-MAY-2015 by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
            Last edited by Khalsa; May 29 2015, 03:16 PM.

            Comment


            • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

              Thank you Khalsa ji. Any news on Kherki Dhaula cases?

              Comment


              • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

                Search By Case Number
                *Case Type *Case Number *Case Year




                Case Detail: Case Type: CWP Case No: 8055 Case Year: 2008
                Case-ID Petition Name Respondent Name Advocate Name Status Next Date
                CWP-8055-2008 JANDHA SINGH AND ORS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SHAILENDRA JAIN RESERVED NOT AVAILABLE



                This is Today's Case status in Hon'ble Court : The Judgement has been Reserved

                Seems things have taken its final shape.

                Yash

                Comment


                • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                  CHANDIGARH
                  1- CWP No. 8060 of 2008
                  Devashish Chakraverty and ors. ..... Petitioners
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  2- CWP No. 8697 of 2008
                  K.Srinidhi and ors. ..... Petitioners
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  3- CWP No. 8771 of 2008(O&M)
                  Mrs. Karuna Gupta and ors. ..... Petitioners
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  4- CWP No. 16712 of 2008
                  Rishi Pal ..... Petitioner
                  Versus
                  Union of India and ors. .... Respondents
                  5- CWP No. 12211 of 2009
                  Devashish Chakraverty and ors. ..... Petitioners
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  6- CWP No. 16568 of 2009(O&M)
                  Lallan Thakur and ors. ..... Petitioners
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  -
                  7- CWP No. 9130 of 2014
                  Smt. Mamta ..... Petitioner
                  CWP No. 8060 of 2008 and connected cases
                  -2-
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  8- CWP No. 24580 of 2014
                  Nirja Tikoo and ors. ..... Petitioners
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  9- CWP No. 26544 of 2014
                  Renu Mishara and ors. ..... Petitioners
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  10- CWP No. 3144 of 2015
                  Urmila Yadav ..... Petitioner
                  Versus
                  State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                  Date of Decision: 20.05.2015
                  CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
                  HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
                  --
                  Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Advocate with
                  Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate
                  Mr. Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with
                  Ms. Mannu Chaudhary, Advocate
                  Ms. Ranjit Mehta, Advocate
                  Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with
                  Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate
                  for the petitioners.
                  Mr. Amar Vivek, Addl. A.G., Haryana
                  for respondent-State
                  CWP No. 8060 of 2008 and connected cases
                  -3-
                  Mr. Arun Walia, Sr. Advocate with
                  Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate
                  Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate
                  for HUDA.
                  --
                  SATISH KUMAR MITTAL,J .(ORAL)
                  This order shall dispose of aforesaid ten writ petitions
                  filed by various petitioners challenging notifications dated 25.01.2008
                  and 18.03.2008 issued under Section 4 read with section 17(1) and
                  (4) and Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the
                  Act') respectively; as well as the subsequent proceedings and the
                  award dated 23.12.2009 whereby the houses/land/plots of the
                  petitioners are also sought to be acquired.
                  With the intervention of this Court and with the able
                  assistance provided by learned Additional Advocate General,
                  Haryana, Mr. Amar Vivek the matter has been amicably resolved and
                  the parties have agreed on written final terms of settlement, copy
                  whereof has been filed by learned Additional Advocate General,
                  Haryana. The same is taken on record as Annexure A-1.
                  Learned counsel for the petitioners on the instructions
                  from their clients, who are present in the Court, have agreed to the
                  said final settlement, copy of which has been placed on record as
                  Annexure A-1 and a joint prayer has been made by the learned
                  counsel for the parties on instructions from their respective clients
                  that all the aforesaid writ petitions be disposed of in view of the
                  aforesaid final terms of settlement between the parties. It has also
                  been agreed that the reference already filed by some of the
                  CWP No. 8060 of 2008 and connected cases
                  -4-
                  petitioners and the references likely to be filed by some others under
                  Section 18 of the Act shall be decided expeditiously,preferably within
                  a period of nine months or a year. It has also been agreed during
                  the course of arguments that the Nodal Officer-cum-Administrator,
                  Gurgaon will take into consideration the GPA, SPA and agreement to
                  sell held by some of the petitioners in these cases and will consider
                  the same on merit, as per the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme
                  Court in case titled Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ltd. Through
                  Director vs. State of Haryana and anr., 2012(1) SCC 656.
                  In view of the aforesaid stand taken by learned counsel
                  for both the parties, and the aforesaid written final terms of
                  settlement (Annexure A-1), arrived at between them, all these ten writ
                  petitions are disposed of in terms of the aforesaid settlement and
                  agreement.
                  Ordered accordingly.
                  ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )
                  JUDGE
                  ( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU )
                  JUDGE
                  20.05.2015



                  This is Order of 20.5.2015 regarding Disposal of NPV cases.

                  Yash

                  Comment


                  • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates

                    Originally posted by palyash View Post
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                    CHANDIGARH
                    1- CWP No. 8060 of 2008
                    Devashish Chakraverty and ors. ..... Petitioners
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    2- CWP No. 8697 of 2008
                    K.Srinidhi and ors. ..... Petitioners
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    3- CWP No. 8771 of 2008(O&M)
                    Mrs. Karuna Gupta and ors. ..... Petitioners
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    4- CWP No. 16712 of 2008
                    Rishi Pal ..... Petitioner
                    Versus
                    Union of India and ors. .... Respondents
                    5- CWP No. 12211 of 2009
                    Devashish Chakraverty and ors. ..... Petitioners
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    6- CWP No. 16568 of 2009(O&M)
                    Lallan Thakur and ors. ..... Petitioners
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    -
                    7- CWP No. 9130 of 2014
                    Smt. Mamta ..... Petitioner
                    CWP No. 8060 of 2008 and connected cases
                    -2-
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    8- CWP No. 24580 of 2014
                    Nirja Tikoo and ors. ..... Petitioners
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    9- CWP No. 26544 of 2014
                    Renu Mishara and ors. ..... Petitioners
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    10- CWP No. 3144 of 2015
                    Urmila Yadav ..... Petitioner
                    Versus
                    State of Haryana and ors. .... Respondents
                    Date of Decision: 20.05.2015
                    CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
                    HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
                    --
                    Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Advocate with
                    Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate
                    Mr. Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with
                    Ms. Mannu Chaudhary, Advocate
                    Ms. Ranjit Mehta, Advocate
                    Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with
                    Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate
                    for the petitioners.
                    Mr. Amar Vivek, Addl. A.G., Haryana
                    for respondent-State
                    CWP No. 8060 of 2008 and connected cases
                    -3-
                    Mr. Arun Walia, Sr. Advocate with
                    Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate
                    Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate
                    for HUDA.
                    --
                    SATISH KUMAR MITTAL,J .(ORAL)
                    This order shall dispose of aforesaid ten writ petitions
                    filed by various petitioners challenging notifications dated 25.01.2008
                    and 18.03.2008 issued under Section 4 read with section 17(1) and
                    (4) and Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the
                    Act') respectively; as well as the subsequent proceedings and the
                    award dated 23.12.2009 whereby the houses/land/plots of the
                    petitioners are also sought to be acquired.
                    With the intervention of this Court and with the able
                    assistance provided by learned Additional Advocate General,
                    Haryana, Mr. Amar Vivek the matter has been amicably resolved and
                    the parties have agreed on written final terms of settlement, copy
                    whereof has been filed by learned Additional Advocate General,
                    Haryana. The same is taken on record as Annexure A-1.
                    Learned counsel for the petitioners on the instructions
                    from their clients, who are present in the Court, have agreed to the
                    said final settlement, copy of which has been placed on record as
                    Annexure A-1 and a joint prayer has been made by the learned
                    counsel for the parties on instructions from their respective clients
                    that all the aforesaid writ petitions be disposed of in view of the
                    aforesaid final terms of settlement between the parties. It has also
                    been agreed that the reference already filed by some of the
                    CWP No. 8060 of 2008 and connected cases
                    -4-
                    petitioners and the references likely to be filed by some others under
                    Section 18 of the Act shall be decided expeditiously,preferably within
                    a period of nine months or a year. It has also been agreed during
                    the course of arguments that the Nodal Officer-cum-Administrator,
                    Gurgaon will take into consideration the GPA, SPA and agreement to
                    sell held by some of the petitioners in these cases and will consider
                    the same on merit, as per the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme
                    Court in case titled Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ltd. Through
                    Director vs. State of Haryana and anr., 2012(1) SCC 656.
                    In view of the aforesaid stand taken by learned counsel
                    for both the parties, and the aforesaid written final terms of
                    settlement (Annexure A-1), arrived at between them, all these ten writ
                    petitions are disposed of in terms of the aforesaid settlement and
                    agreement.
                    Ordered accordingly.
                    ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )
                    JUDGE
                    ( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU )
                    JUDGE
                    20.05.2015



                    This is Order of 20.5.2015 regarding Disposal of NPV cases.

                    Yash
                    Thanks A lot Yash

                    Comment


                    • Re : NPR - Northern Peripheral Road, Dwarka Expressway, Gurgaon Updates


                      "all the aforesaid writ petitions be disposed of in view of the
                      aforesaid final terms of settlement between the parties."

                      Does above mean all the cases has been disposed of or what?

                      Comment

                      Have any questions or thoughts about this?
                      Working...
                      X