3C Lotus Panache, Noida

Anyone booked with the 3C Lotus Panache in Noida so far?
Read more
Reply
13217 Replies
Sort by :Filter by :
  • Originally Posted by vishal1880
    Like all BBs all the clauses are favourable (only for the Builder). Resisting will not help brother, coz every one else would have signed it by now. I for one like i said earlier recived my BBA in October (for LB) I have still not signed it... and guess I eventually will have to!

    But I just read about the UP Apartments act and that Paras PPl are opposing it... so would just hold on to it...

    BTW I have paid 30%



    Well, maybe not modify the existing clauses but the Builder can look at adding a few more. Like there is absolutely no mention of common facilities, power back up, etc details in the BBA. When they can put a price on that - why cant they put up the details in the BBA. Not sure about what other builders do, but 3C has very conveiniently covered it ss by having a clause saying that the overall super area can be +/- 8% of the mentioned. It pretty f'ed up agreement I must say.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by capreal26
    Well, maybe not modify the existing clauses but the Builder can look at adding a few more. Like there is absolutely no mention of common facilities, power back up, etc details in the BBA. When they can put a price on that - why cant they put up the details in the BBA. Not sure about what other builders do, but 3C has very conveiniently covered it ss by having a clause saying that the overall super area can be +/- 8% of the mentioned. It pretty f'ed up agreement I must say.


    If its a plus - you will be made to pay for every 'presumed' extra inch of super area. If its less (oops it never would be). Damn just write that overall super area can be +8% cos it nvr wld be less.
    CommentQuote
  • here is an attachment which clearly shows the loading for a 1415 sf unit at panache is a little more than 26%, if we take the inner corridor from the main entrance towards the unit, the loading would reduce to just 23%..
    attached is a comparison between the old layout of 1409 sf and the new 1415 sf unit..
    Attachments:
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by sacho19
    here is an attachment which clearly shows the loading for a 1415 sf unit at panache is a little more than 26%, if we take the inner corridor from the main entrance towards the unit, the loading would reduce to just 23%..
    attached is a comparison between the old layout of 1409 sf and the new 1415 sf unit..

    Just 2 quick ones:

    1. Area of the wall not taken.
    2. Fot Balcony max 50% of the area is taken as carpet area (in some cases its taken as zero also)

    But relax I dont want to open a can of worms here but the super area is around 25% more that of the Carpet Area + Wall area
    CommentQuote
  • Guys my two cents, I have done some casual reading of the UP Apartments act. According to it -


      The builder must specify the common facilities.



        Also later after three years if more than 50% people create an RWA then they can take over the common facilities from the builder.

        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.
        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.
        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.
        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.
        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.
        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.
        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by KMP_FNG
    For any successful project hv some following reasons -

    1. Nearer to Delhi ( As commuting from Delhi to 3C is lesser than Sec 70 -77 sector)
    2. Adjacent to Expressway ( U can take the history of all projects in Delhi/NCR adjacent to Highway always give higher return like NH8 & NH24 property, but if u will see Sec 70-77 , these r far away from any highway)
    3. Big Brand Name & Commitment ( 3C in past already proved in commercial sector & see the progress work in LB )
    4. Big brand surrounding (As soon as JP Township & Unitech Grande will be operational , Expressway will attract corporates)
    5. As JP is coming with 5 star hotel , which will be nearer to 3C.
    6. chances of Investment for big corporates will be only on express way in coming 3-4 yrs not in sec 70 -77 (Nearer to 3C).
    7. Expressway first left cut is in expressway ( so enjoy driving in expressway )
    8. Go existing sec 37 metro station even from public transport.
    9. Metro will come on sec 82 not in sec 70-77.
    10. Already people r living here , good market is within 1 km radius.
    11. People r so much talking about 3C that means it is on the right path.

    So, Guys don't think small negative things about this project as nothing is 100% perfect , few things may be discomfort u, but best thing of this project is its location , growth prospects, brand & unique green concept , may be we will not get 100% committed as per BBA but if we will get even 70 % this will be far better than all other projects.
    comments r invited .............................



    Hi KMP FNG

    Pls restrain yourself from airing the facts and truth, else someone may label you as BHAJAN SINGER for 3C, as someone did to me.

    In agreement with you to a great extent. I am also very optimistic like you not only for this project, but for whatever I do.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by sacho19
    here is an attachment which clearly shows the loading for a 1415 sf unit at panache is a little more than 26%, if we take the inner corridor from the main entrance towards the unit, the loading would reduce to just 23%..
    attached is a comparison between the old layout of 1409 sf and the new 1415 sf unit..


    Useful info Sacho. Thanx.

    Today I have rcvd back my signed BBA (original copy) from 3C through courier.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by vsangal
    Guys my two cents, I have done some casual reading of the UP Apartments act. According to it -


      The builder must specify the common facilities.


        Also later after three years if more than 50% people create an RWA then they can take over the common facilities from the builder.
        There are some more clauses but I am overwhelmed with the above two only. Just think if the builder clearly specify everything in the BBA then there will be no tension, no sleepless nights.

        Thanx dear. This will always remain a bone of contention between buyers and builder. Builder would not want to give up his claim on club and other common facilities. Can something be done about it now, even though many of us we have signed BBA. Even signed BBA, if it is not as per law, does not have legal sanctity and can be modified.
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by sanjaysood
    Thanx dear. This will always remain a bone of contention between buyers and builder. Builder would not want to give up his claim on club and other common facilities. Can something be done about it now, even though many of us we have signed BBA. Even signed BBA, if it is not as per law, does not have legal sanctity and can be modified.



    just ask 3c to modify bba and make it compliant with new legislation.

    every reputed builder company would like to be on the right side of law.

    even the bank financing the buyers/project can demand it.

    remember there is a provision for criminal punishmnt in aapartment act for its voilation.

    best of luck.
    CommentQuote
  • Hi
    Are vishal bhai ji ko kisne bann kar diya :bab (38):
    2
    Originally Posted by vishal1880
    Dont bother, I got my BB in October last year I am yet to send it back. I spoke to 3C and they said its necessery only if you plan to taka a loan. But surprisingly my loan got approved without the BBA
    CommentQuote
  • Rwa

    Originally Posted by sanjaysood
    Thanx dear. This will always remain a bone of contention between buyers and builder. Builder would not want to give up his claim on club and other common facilities. Can something be done about it now, even though many of us we have signed BBA. Even signed BBA, if it is not as per law, does not have legal sanctity and can be modified.


    Only if an RWA is formed, the builder will be kicked out of the society and will avoid situations like Ceyanne Tower in Supertech Emerald Court where green area gets converted into more towers. People need to take over management of the society in their own hands and get the builders out asap.
    CommentQuote
  • IGRM,
    it is unbilievable that you have banned Vishal. Could you please give any plausible reasons? As far as I know, his posts have always been decent and informative and he has been one of the most active members of the forum. Your forum is a nullity without such members.

    Thanks IGRM for lifting the ban and also for getting rid of that canman thing. Welcome back, Vishal.
    CommentQuote
  • #Sanjay
    just a request
    Please use normal fonts and colors like others. That would be easy for all of us.
    Thanks in advance :)
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by vksharma2020
    igrm,
    it is unbilievable that you have banned vishal. Could you please give any plausible reasons? As far as i know, his posts have always been decent and informative and he has been one of the most active members of the forum. Your forum is a nullity without such members.


    yes why has vishal been banned!? I need a carlsberg now!!!
    CommentQuote
  • Originally Posted by onlyvicky
    Only if an RWA is formed, the builder will be kicked out of the society and will avoid situations like Ceyanne Tower in Supertech Emerald Court where green area gets converted into more towers. People need to take over management of the society in their own hands and get the builders out asap.


    Yes, UP Apartment Act makes it commendatory for the builder to handover all common areas to RWA and exit from the project. So no chances of builder milking more money......
    CommentQuote