No announcement yet.

Understanding The Ground Realty


Understanding The Ground Realty

Last updated: February 5 2007
0 | Posts
2044 | Views
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Understanding The Ground Realty

    An analyst with a longer memory than most, recently said that the current love affair with land banks reminded him of the 1999-2000 obsession with techs. On the face of it, it’s an absurd comparison. There are few things more reassuringly solid than real estate and few things more virtual than infotech.

    Yet, there is a similarity. “Market” has uncritically assigned high valuations to land banks in the same way that he blindly assigned triple-digit PEs to the IT industry not too many years ago.

    In 1999, companies in all sorts of disparate businesses multiplied valuations by adding “Infotech”, “infosystems” or some such coined word with cyber-connotation to their names.

    In 2006, companies derived similar benefits from owning land banks. Never mind that they often operate in sectors with little connection to real estate development.

    It is one thing to hold potentially valuable real estate. It is another matter entirely to unlock that value.

    One can even stretch the imagination and concede that Indiabulls’ deliberate acquisition of a land bank offers partial justification for astronomical valuation.

    Real estate companies ranging from Ansal to Anant Raj to Parasvnath to Unitech have all delivered outstanding returns in the first three quarters of 2006-7. Partly through being able to unlock value through projects; partly through the mere possession of land banks.

    But how does one value a land bank? The practical problems render it an opaque, exercise. There are risks explicitly mentioned in draft red herring prospectuses of a rapidly corporatising industry. What’s more, most Indian investors know these problems since they differ only in scale with issues that most have faced.

    First, there’s an apples and oranges problem. Valuation per square foot differs even within metros - by several hundred percent between upmarket areas and slums. Valuations differ even more when it comes to Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. When it comes to agricultural land versus urban land, the price differences are still larger.

    In most cases, we don’t have a clear break up of a given land bank. So, it’s impossible to simply multiply acres into average price and arrive at consistent valuations. There is no such thing as an average price.

    Then, there’s the legal situation. Title is often disputed. Some land banks have been built on partial payments and “byanas” - the right of first purchase. Sometimes, it is through power-of-attorney sales or joint venture agreements between titleholder and the real estate firm
Have any questions or thoughts about this?